The beginning of the international policy of the USSR, which would be more correctly called the international genocide of the Russian people, formally has a specific date. Letter from V. Lenin-Blank “On the question of nationalities or “autonomization”,” dated December 31, 1922, reads: “internationalism on the part of the oppressor or the so-called “great” nation (albeit great only by its violence, great only in the way that the government is great) should consist not only in observing the formal equality of nations, but also in such inequality that would compensate on the part of the oppressing nation , the nation is large, the inequality that actually develops in life"
Thus, based on the Russophobic theses of Marxism about “the struggle for destruction and merciless terror against the Slavs”
, abstracts in style "Drang nacht Osten"
And "Slavic bastard"
, as well as personal hatred, the “leader of the world proletariat” calls the Great Russians “oppressors, oppressors” - although the proletariat at that time was almost 90% Russian. At the same time, Lenin unequivocally insisted: internationalism must consist in the inequality of rights of Great Russians. Propagandists always exclude this unequivocal instruction from Lenin, but they clearly reduce all the vices of such “internationalism” to the activities of “bloody Stalin.”
But the materials of the XII Congress of the RCP (b) tell a different story. It was Stalin who prepared the report “National Moments in Party and State Construction” for this congress. The abstracts of the report were published in the newspaper Pravda No. 65, March 24, 1923, that is, a month before the congress, signed by him. These theses could not be published without the prior approval of the Central Committee of the RCP(b) and its Politburo. Internationalists had a decisive influence in the Politburo:
- Leon Trotsky (Leiba Bronstein);
- Grigory Zinoviev (Gersh Radomyslsky-Apelbaum);
- Lev Kamenev (Leiba Rosenfeld), who since 1922, due to Lenin’s “illness,” chaired meetings of the Politburo of the RCP (b).
It is quite obvious that in order to gain the approval of these Politburo members, the theses had to comply with Lenin's instructions. Therefore, the essence of Stalin’s theses is (supposedly) “the fight against Great Russian chauvinism.”
The XII Congress of the RCP(b) took place on April 17-25, 1923. The internationalists aimed the congress at world revolution. This is how it sounded in Zinoviev-Apelbaum’s speech: “Comrade Lenin said that present-day Russia and Germany remind him of two disparate halves of two future chickens in one shell... In a communist state from the Rhine to the Urals, Russians will not make up even a third...".
It is clear that Zinoviev was not interested in the fate of the Great Russians.
The internationalist Rakovsky insisted: “In national relations you need to tune in to the West.”
Responding to Rakovsky’s speech, Stalin objected unequivocally:
“This is impossible, comrades, and unnatural, because people in general either turn their faces in one direction or the other - it is impossible to turn in both directions at the same time. We cannot and should not break the general tone of the theses, their oriental tone.”
COMPARE THE POSITIONS OF LENIN AND STALIN IN THE 1920s
Lenin: internationalism should consist in INEQUALITY of Great Russians.
Stalin: “to put the Great Russian proletariat in a position of unequal rights means to say incongruity... the political basis is the central regions, not the outskirts.”
The difference in approaches is obvious!
On the national question, Stalin differed most strikingly from Lenin and his “international” circle.
They say: Stalin was an all-powerful dictator. But why didn’t he complete what he defended at the XII Congress of the RCP(b)? The bottom line is that from the very beginning of the coup of 1917, internationalists of the Trotskyist variety seized total dominance over all means of mass influence on the brains of the Russian people: from the Council of People's Commissars to the house committee and led all press and cinema organs - simultaneously destroying the foundations and traditions of the Russian people - right down to the physical the destruction of Orthodox priests, churches and monuments dedicated to the victories of the Russian people - which was personally controlled by Kaganovich and Yaroslavsky-Guberman. At the same time, the concept of “internationalism” was turned into a fetish. But behind it was pharisaically hidden a completely different meaning - the physical, moral and cultural destruction of the Russian people by a gang of “Judeo-commissars” carrying within themselves the Russophobia of Marx-Engels and the monstrous racist charge of Judaism.
For those who have doubts, I recommend that you familiarize yourself with the statistics found in the “Jewish Encyclopedia” - when, against the backdrop of the massive closure of Orthodox churches and the destruction of Russian priests, from the 1920s to 1932 the number of synagogues and yeshivas increased by 1.7 times. At the same time, the proclaimed policy of family destruction, “sexual permissiveness” and a gap between children and adults was introduced.
This is especially clearly shown by the “imperishable” 1936 from L. Trotsky-Bronstein “The Betrayed Revolution”, in which he, from the position of a degenerate and “juvenile”, angrily castigates Stalin for the fact that he actually returned the concept of “damned Christian morality” to Soviet society. , except perhaps “without mentioning God.”
The situation changed only after the war
But even after the congress of the “winners” (XVII Congress of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, February 1934), when Stalin managed to concentrate power, he was unable to overcome the total domination of the “internationalists” in the media. Moreover, with the beginning of the first purges of “internationalists” in 1931, he was forced to justify himself in the “world press,” although by 1937 he had largely succeeded in clearing the NKVD and the Red Army of them.
Meanwhile, remaining captive to the dogmas of Marxism, “pre-war” Stalin failed to fully develop the vector that was set by Lenin: “internationalism” should consist in INEQUALITY of the Great Russians.”
After the war, the situation changed - until Stalin was killed by the “internationalists”.
WHAT THE PRACTICE OF “INTERNATIONALISM” LEADED TO
In relation to demography, another fundamental difference between Stalin and the “Judeo-commissars” is especially important. This difference relates to the area of family morality. Having seized power, they abolished all traditional moral norms. Family, love, chastity, and renunciation of sexual perversion were declared “outdated.”
One of the main goals of the internationalists was the elimination of the institution of the Family. Immediately after the 1917 coup, they abolished the indissolubility of family marriage. And on November 19, 1920, the Jewish Commissioners legalized abortion. Since the Russian people for them were the main object of their hatred and material for experiments, already in the 1920s the propaganda of divorce, abortion, sodomy and lesbianism began - precisely among the Russian people.
Stalin was not a pervert. He, unlike the “internationalist-Leninists,” had firm principles in the field of family morality. But it took more than 10 years for Stalin to repeal the harmful laws. Only after the congress of the “winners” in 1934, when he was able to concentrate power, on his initiative were the norms of healthy morality restored: divorces were sharply limited, abortions were prohibited and became criminally punishable. For example, criminal liability for sodomy was restored on March 7, 1934 (once again we suggest assessing Stalin’s position based on the “critical article” of Trotsky-Bronstein, who screamed about a “betrayed revolution”).
Of course, Stalin, as the head of state, exploited the Russian people. But not by the cries of the last of the Judeo-commissars, but by demographic statistics, one must objectively evaluate the fruits of his activities. And the numbers clearly show that the destructive demographic exploitation of the Russian people began precisely after the death of Stalin: the graph of the “Russian Core” (diagram 1) clearly shows growth until the first half of the 1950s, and a collapse at the end of the second half of the decade. As a result of “de-Stalinization,” the number of growing children born in the mid-1960s is one and one times less than in the first half of the 1950s.
Officially, the collapse of the 1960s is explained by the “echo” of the Great Patriotic War, when at the beginning
In the 1960s, the “children of war” grew up to childbearing age. But the “echo of war” is no more than 40% of the collapse in the “Russian Core”. In the second half of the 1950s, the “de-Stalinizers” claimed that they had returned “Leninist policies.” So 60% of the demographic collapse of the “Russian Core” is due to two policy factors of precisely the “loyal Leninists”.
The first factor is the abolition of criminal liability for abortion (Decree of August 5, 1954) and the abolition of the ban on abortion. Thus, the “faithful Leninists” of the 1950s returned the devilish “norm” of killing children in the womb, which the Judeo-commissars introduced on November 19, 1920, abolished by the “tyrant Stalin” after the “Congress of Victors” in 1934. Let us note that before this, with “lead and propaganda,” the Judeo-commissars also aggressively destroyed the traditional morality of the younger generation of Russians; a new wave of “fight against religion” began under the unfinished Trotskyist Khrushchev, as a result of which young women went to the chairs of abortion clinics. But at the same time, the Judases did not take the Central Asian republics “seriously”, so the Uzbek women who remained “captive of folk and Islamic traditions” did not commit infanticide.
What did the policy of “faithful Leninists” lead to? To the rapid growth of abortions, which continued until 1964: Russian births - 1.5 million, abortions performed on Russian women - 5 million. That is, for every Russian child born, 3-4 were cut out in the womb of their mothers (169 abortions per 1000 women reproductive age). In 1965, the net population reproduction rate for the first time in peacetime dropped below one, that is, below the limit of simple generation replacement, and the ratio of births and abortions was 100 to 278. In the 1960-80s. the number of abortions for Russian women gradually decreased, but in total reached 90 million!
It should be noted that in the 1970s, the nomenklatura began to get hooked on the “oil needle” and contacts with the Masonic “Club of Rome”, which promoted the ideas of population reduction. This “convergence” led to the final destruction of the USSR. As a result, the number of abortions increased sharply in the 1990s.
The second factor is the liquidation of “unpromising villages” and the destruction of individual subsidiary farms with the ban on owning horses and cows by the same Khrushchev. According to the reports of “economists”, the elimination of “unpromising” supposedly had a huge effect. But “economics” can justify anything - especially when it does not take into account the factor of personal farming, when a resident of a traditional village found himself completely cut off from his centuries-old roots, including the graves of his ancestors, which, in part, repeated the situation with Stolypin’s reforms and the emergence of lumpen proletarians.
As a result, by 1970, 235 thousand villages were liquidated, and the share of rural births in the regions of the “Russian Core” fell by 3-5 times. For developing a program for the elimination of “unpromising villages,” the authors received awards from the Kremlin, and they were awarded the title of “academician.” And they still “work” at the RAS.
After the harsh blows of the “loyal Leninists,” the number of growing children in the “Russian Core” could no longer recover to the level of the 1950s. The slight growth that began in the late 1960s and ended in 1987 is a consequence of the large number of growing children in the “Russian Core” born in the 1950s.
Referring to Lenin, Bukharin stated: “we, as a former great-power nation, must put ourselves in an unequal position in the sense of even greater concessions to national trends.” And he proposed to exclude the clause about the dangers of local nationalism. As a result, Stalin's report was postponed to the last days of the congress, when all the leaders had already spoken. If, when publishing theses in March, Stalin needed the approval of the Politburo, then at the congress there was no longer a need for this.
It was important for Stalin to convey his position to the maximum number of listeners. Therefore, when addressing the delegates, he spoke about the role of the Russian people in a significantly different way than what followed from Lenin’s position.
Stalin understood: the main national problems in the USSR would arise with the peoples of the East. Therefore, addressing directly the congress delegates, Stalin responded to Bukharin’s proposal as follows:
“...we are told that we must not offend the nationals. But to create from this a theory that it is necessary to place the Great Russian proletariat in a position of unequal rights is to say inconsistency. Meanwhile, it is clear that the political basis is mainly the central industrial regions, and not the outskirts.
If we fight only against Great Russian chauvinism, then this fight will overshadow the struggle of Tatar and other chauvinists, which is developing locally and which is dangerous... We may end up with encouragement of local chauvinism, a policy of rewarding local chauvinism, which we cannot allow.
If nationalism were only defensive, there would be no fuss about it. But the trouble is that in some republics nationalism turns into offensive.”
Among the speakers on the national question were characters such as Karl Radek (Karol Sobelzon) - for whom moral values did not exist at all. Stalin answered him: “Radek said that the Armenians oppress or can oppress the Azerbaijanis in Azerbaijan and, conversely, the Azerbaijanis can oppress the Armenians in Armenia. I must state that such phenomena generally do not occur in nature. The opposite happens: in Azerbaijan, the Azerbaijanis, like the majority, oppress the Armenians and massacre, as was the case in Nakhichevan, where almost all Armenians were massacred, and the Armenians in Armenia massacred almost all the Tatars. This was in Zangezur. But for a minority in a state to oppress the people of the majority, such unnatural things have never happened.”
If Stalin lived today, he would clearly see that in Russia it is the minority that oppresses the majority!!!
THE ESSENCE OF THE SOVIET PLATE POLICY
This essence was in the huge difference between the production fund and the consumption fund between the RSFSR and the “national republics”. The share of production per capita in the RSFSR was many times greater, and consumption, on the contrary, was several times less. Those. the development of the outskirts was subsidized at the expense of the Russian regions - in strict accordance with the “behaviors of Ilyich,” the policy of “internationalism” consisted of inequality of rights for the Great Russians.
Back in 1987, Galina Ilyinichna Litvinova, Doctor of Law, leading researcher at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, having access to Gosplan materials, showed: the Russian people are the most disenfranchised people of the USSR. So, for example, in accordance with the “behaviors of Ilyich,” the RSFSR did not even have its own Communist Party; the first secretaries of the Central Committee were predominantly people from the largest Communist Party of Ukraine, who easily “donated” entire Russian regions to the “national republics.”
Using specific figures and facts, Litvinova proved that the entire burden of tax and budget policy, the policy of purchase prices and state supplies of agricultural products fell on the Slavic republics, which were simply fleeced. According to her data, average monthly incomes in the Uzbek and Tajik SSRs were 9 times higher than in the RSFSR.
“The most important task today,” Litvinova wrote, “is to stop the deliberate genocide of the Russian people.” But most of her articles on the topic of lawlessness of the Russian people were not allowed to be published by the “Kremlin censors.” There were cases when even her articles typed in the printing house were scattered by order “from above” (the fact of the exploitation of Russian regions was confirmed by Russophobe E. Gaidar, but only in 2006, but did he make the calculations himself, or did he use the materials that he stole from the editorial office magazine "Communist", where he worked exactly in 1987-90?).
The fact that the “Soviet plate” quite specifically encouraged the birth rate of children in Uzbekistan and suppressed the birth rate in Russian regions is clearly shown by the graphs in Diagram I.
Sometimes they talk about an increase in the Russian birth rate due to the implementation of the Resolution of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR “On measures to strengthen state assistance to families with children” dated January 22, 1981.
This Decree in the 1980s did not affect the births of Russian children. But it is significant for the birth of children in Uzbekistan. Since 1980, the number of children in Uzbekistan has increased 1.5 times.
Thus, the “international” policy led to the inharmonious development of the peoples of the USSR.
WHAT'S AHEAD
For analytical studies of long time intervals, the most accurate indicator is the number of children by year of their birth. In practice, it is important to know the immediate demographic future. For this purpose, the most important indicator is the dynamics of the number of 20-year-olds. By the age of 20, the number of grown men and women is almost equal. Women in their 20s are at the beginning of their most active childbearing years. 20-year-old men are the age of active search for the realization of their strengths and abilities.
Of course, the dynamics of the number of 20-year-olds can be plotted for long time intervals, just like the number of GROWING children. But in practice, it is more important to know a shorter time interval, covering part of the past, today's times and the expected future.
For demography, where the count is in thousands and millions, comparison by difference is of little use. More suitable is the ratio. It is best to start comparing the number of 20-year-olds when their ratio is almost equal to one. It is by this ratio that regions should be selected to compare the past, present and future. The initial indicator is again an equal number of GROWING children by year of their birth. To estimate the number of 20-year-olds, you only need to “move” forward on the time scale by 20 years. This selection leads to the fact that it is necessary to compare the 20-year-old “Russian Core” with a region of much larger size than Uzbekistan.
Without going into details, it is necessary to take the beginning of the 1970s, all of Central Asia and the Caucasus, as the initial coordinate. It was then that the ratio of the number of 20-year-olds is close to one (the initial data for the calculation is the Demoscope Weekly reference book).
For clarity, the ratio of the number of 20-year-olds in Central Asia together with the Caucasus to the 20-year-olds of the “Russian core”
As you can see, there is a continuous overwhelming excess of the number of 20-year-olds in the East over the 20-year-olds of the “Russian Core”.
If the ratio of 20 year olds was:
- in the early 1970s - 1:1;
- by the mid-1980s - 3:1;
- then by 2010 it was already 6:1.
Moreover, this excess is calculated until the early 2030s. After all, as of 2013, they were all already born and growing. Some part - a few percent - of the children born will die at the youngest childhood age, but this ratio will not change the number of 20-year-olds.
Next, I invite readers to think for themselves about the question of how Russians are dying out. Take a look at the number of Russians in the “Russian Core” according to censuses:
- in 1959 - 29 million 825 people;
- in 1989 - 29 million 150 thousand;
- in 2010 - 24 million 650 thousand.
So over 50 years, according to official data alone, the “Russian core” has decreased by 5 million. Moreover, the bulk of the reduction has occurred in the last 20 years. Here is how the percentage of Russians changed in the “Russian Core”:
- in 1959 - 96.4%
- in 1989 - 95.1%;
- in 2010 - 91.7%.
And this is according to official data. The reality is much worse. Smolin writes: “Of course, from my youth I remember the formula: there are lies, there are blatant lies, and there are statistics! Of course, I myself have repeatedly used alternative data from sociological services and institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences. And yet, the data of the ex-director of the Research Institute of Statistics, summarized in one table entitled “Dual assessments of the main indicators of the development of the Russian economy in 2001-2010,” make a shocking impression.” Smolin presented them with his comments on the pages of Soviet Russia. So - here is a terrifying picture of the DEGRADATION of our country in the “dry” calculations not of anyone, but, we repeat, until recently - the director of the Research Institute of Statistics of Rosstat:
National wealth of Russia. Official: $4.0 trillion. In fact (according to the Research Institute of Statistics of the State Statistics Committee of Russia): $40 trillion. The understatement by 10 times, Smolin comments, is necessary for the authorities in order to sell off the remains of the former national property for next to nothing to oligarchs and foreigners, and at the same time hammer into the population that we live no worse than we work.
The amount of intellectual capital. Official: $1.5 trillion. In fact: $25 trillion. The underestimation of Russia's intellectual capital by almost 17 times, according to Smolin, helps the authorities justify their policy of copying the worst examples of foreign education, as well as importing foreign scientists at exorbitant prices with the meager support of their own.
Share of investments in % of GDP. Officially: 18.5%. Actually: 12.2%. Overestimating investment in the economy by one and a half times creates a picture of false prosperity, Smolin continues. In fact, the country is dominated by a “buy, sell, steal” economy.
GDP growth rate. Officially: 6%. Actually: 4%. By “inflating” the GDP growth rate by one and a half times, the authorities are trying to convince society that its announced doubling for 2003-2010. could have happened if not for the global crisis. In fact, notes Smolin, for 2003-2008. the economy grew by only a quarter, and in the crisis year of 2009 we turned out to be the record holder for decline among the G20 countries! As for GDP, it seems that the deputy sarcastically notes that they are going to not double it, but even quintuple it, but not in the sense of gross domestic product, but of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin: two presidential terms, one prime minister and again two presidential terms, equal in duration to the previous three .
Inflation averaged over the year. Officially: 6-8%. Actually: 18.27%. It has long been known, comments Smolin, that the rise in prices for essential goods in Russia is much faster than the average for all goods and services. Therefore, inflation for the poor (social inflation) is much higher than for the rich. And the poorer the family, the faster the prices for the goods it buys rise. As the ex-director of the Research Institute of Statistics explains, prices for precisely those goods and services that are purchased by the country’s least affluent citizens are rising by 18% per year. It is therefore not surprising that even the government recognizes the growing gap between rich and poor almost every year. Data from the Research Institute of Statistics mean, in particular, that the so-called so-called praised by the authorities. increase in pensions in 2009-2010. at best, compensated for the rise in prices for essential goods for two years.
Income gap between the richest 10% and the poorest 10%. Officially: 16 times. In fact: 28-36 times. This is higher than the indicators not only of Western Europe and Japan, not only of the United States, but also of many Latin American countries, notes Smolin. The maximum permissible level for national security, according to the director of the Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences G. Osipov, is 10 times. In Russia it is exceeded three times.
Gap in gross domestic product by region. Officially: 14 times. In fact: 42 times. Socially, Russia has long ceased to be a unified country, writes Smolin. If Moscow lives at the level of the Czech Republic, then the Republic of Tyva is at the level of Mongolia. The federal government is dumping more and more social obligations on the regions and at the same time extracting more and more money from them in order to invest in foreign securities. The poverty of the Russian provinces actually finances, in particular, the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and partly in Libya. Article 114 of the Russian Constitution requires that the government pursue a unified social policy throughout the country. Whether the government is fulfilling its duties when the gaps in regional development are tens of times greater, decide for yourself, Smolin (State Duma deputy from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) addresses the readers.
The share of the population belonging to socially declassed groups, as a percentage of the total population. Officially: 1.5%. Actually: 45%. According to the Research Institute of Statistics (Rosstat), there are 12 million alcoholics, more than 4.5 million drug addicts, and more than 1 million street children in the country. It is not surprising that the official data is underestimated by 30 times: almost half of the underclassed in the richest country is evidence of the complete failure of the economic and social policies of the authorities.
Share of unprofitable enterprises. Officially: 8%. Actually: 40%. In terms of physical indicators, the modern Russian economy is hopelessly behind the Soviet one, and taxes on the real sector, in contrast to taxes on the personal income of billionaires, are enormous, comments Smolin.
Level of general taxation of income received, in%. Officially: 45%. Actually: 90%. It's amazing how we are still working, and why are the oligarchs still lacking? However, notes Oleg Smolin, this partly explains the following indicator.
Level of tax evasion, as a percentage of income. Officially: 30%. Actually: 80%. The authorities, explains Smolin, pretend to collect taxes, and citizens pretend to pay them!
The degree of depreciation of fixed assets, in%. Officially: 48.8%. Actually: 75.4%. If God wants to punish a person, he takes away his mind, writes Smolin. It seems that this has already happened to the Russian authorities. What kind of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) can there be when the depreciation of fixed assets is 3/4? The WTO is not required to export raw materials, and Russia currently has nothing else to export. The remainder of domestic production will be finished off. Transnational capital will become the complete master of the country. However, why would it be?
Share of foreign capital in the Russian economy, in%. In general - officially: 20%. Actually: 75%, including:
- in property. Officially: 25%. Actually: 60%;
- in profits. Officially: 21%. Actually: 70%;
- in shares. Officially: 18%. Actually: 90%.
“This is, gentlemen,” asks Smolin, “your sovereign democracy? If the data from the Research Institute of Statistics are correct, in the economic sense we are turning into a colony amid loud cries that we are getting up from our knees!”
In grants - officially: 14%. Actually: 90%. It’s funny, notes Smolin, that the authorities are very afraid of foreign grants, but at the same time they calmly take foreign loans and encourage the sale of our enterprises to foreigners!
Real costs of modernization, billion rubles. Officially: 750. Actually: 30. Is it because the real costs of modernization are 25 times lower than announced, our technological lag is increasing, and all its “steam” is running out of steam?
Efficiency of modernization, as a percentage of costs. Officially: 25%. Actually: 2.5%. Of course: in order to justify “inflated” costs, writes Smolin, it is necessary to show “inflated” results. If you multiply one by the other, the effect turns out to be embellished by about 250 times! However, it was clear before that all the noise about modernization was about beautiful storefronts instead of great construction projects.
The difference between manufacturer prices and retail prices is severalfold. Officially: 1.5. Actually: 3.2, including:
- in agriculture. Officially: 1.3. Actually: 4.0. Intermediaries are “getting fat,” workers and buyers are becoming poor, and the authorities, like Verka Serduchka, repeat: “Okay, everything will be fine!..”;
- in government procurement. Officially: 1.1. Actually: 1.6. But here the officials are clearly getting fatter. It is no coincidence that even President Dmitry Medvedev says that as a result of the application of Law No. 94 (on public procurement), about 1 trillion rubles were stolen from the budget.
The difference between the assigned and paid tariffs of natural monopolies is severalfold. Officially: 1.1. Actually: 1.7, incl. in utility bills. Officially: 1.2. Actually: 2.4. If the “utility” were paid at real prices, writes Smolin, it would cost us half as much!
Unemployment rate, as a percentage of employment. Officially: 2-3%. Actually: 10-12%. Around the world, not all unemployed people are registered at the labor exchange. And so there is a difference between official statistics and statistics from the International Labor Organization. However, for this difference to be 4-5 times, you need to falsify the statistics properly!
Number of crimes committed (2009), million people. Official: 3.0. Actually: 4.8. Apparently, we are talking about almost 2 million crimes that are registered, but strangely do not appear in official statistics, notes Smolin. However, much more important are the crimes that are either not registered at all, or those for which people do not contact law enforcement agencies. According to estimates by a group of scientists from the Research Institute of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation under the leadership of Professor S. Inshakov, the number of such crimes is almost 10 times more than official statistics record - approximately 26 million per year.
This is the second part of a series of articles about the genocide of the Russian people.
4. Bleeding Russia by exporting capital to the West
Once a few years ago I read an interview with Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, who was the president of Kalmykia at that time. He spoke bitterly about the fact that what Russia earns, Kudrin collects like a vacuum cleaner and sends it to the USA. These words sank into my soul.
Really, how can this be?
Why should the wealth created by the Russian people enrich Uncle Sam?
And is this government headed by the president really OURS? Or are the Russian leadership, led by Putin, simply stupidly carrying out the will of the West, sending there a river of wealth that should belong to Russia and the people?
Let's face the facts, let's look at the statistics.
Year of outflow/import (billion dollars)
Total -659,5
It is clear from the statistics that the scale of capital flight to the West under Putin has only grown and reached truly gigantic proportions.
The withdrawal of capital to Putin’s Western partners reached especially colossal proportions during the years of the beginning of the crises, when the Russian leadership called on the people to tighten their belts...
Particularly unconscionable for Putin’s political strategists is the reference to the fact that the West has taken up arms against Russia (aha! and that’s probably why they are given so much wealth of the Russian people as a gift! And what do they call those who supply their enemies?).
More than $550 billion was exported from Russia from 2000 to 2015 inclusive.
This is the net export of capital according to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Official. Recorded by banking transactions. And how much was exported unofficially, in the form of cash or goods (raw materials), which was sold abroad, but the money for it never arrived in Russia - one can only guess...
And that is not all. Let's see how much Russian money is invested in American securities.
As of August 2016, 90 billion US dollars belonging to Russia were held in American securities.
These are the facts! While Putin’s political strategists and state media are actively brainwashing the people, suggesting that Putin is opposed to the West, is opposed to the United States, it turns out that not only has the flight of capital to the West not been stopped, the Russian leadership led by Putin, it turns out, keeps money in American securities papers, enriching Uncle Sam, like that!
So know: those who say that Putin is opposed to the United States and the West are simply liars who are trying to deceive the people as suckers (I must note that, alas, not without success).
Meanwhile, thanks to Putin and Co., truly golden rivers are flowing towards the USA and the West!
It turns out that for the people of Russia “there is no money, but you hold on,” but for the Pindos (and for Israeli pensioners) there is money! So it’s not for nothing that Putin calls the United States and the West “our Western partners.”
So, the Russian leadership has money for Putin’s partners, but it’s not only for Russia and the people….
The facts indicate that For the Russian leadership led by Putin, the enemies are not the USA and the West(in fact, these are Putin’s partners, whom he enriches at the expense of Russia and the people), and its own people, who act only as a donor for oligarch cronies and Putin’s Western partners.
In response to this, the Olga residents can start their usual record about the fact that China stores much more in the United States than Russia.
I can remind you that China's industry is such that the whole world is filled with Chinese goods. They do not need to restore the destroyed industry.
Because while in the 90s and 2000s the Russian leadership, first led by Yeltsin, and then led by Putin, was destroying our industry, the Chinese were developing their industry.
So China has a completely different situation, and they can afford to invest money in the United States.
And for Russia it is vital to revive industry. Only, alas, for Putin the interests of his Western partners are more important...
5. Power and its heroes. What the monuments will tell us about: about where we are going, about our future.
Who are the heroes? Why do people erect monuments to them?
A hero is a person of exceptional valor, exceptional courage.
A hero is a person who has done something so important, great and useful, for which people respect and honor him, for which the hero is their example, for which people want to be like him.
Monuments are erected to heroes so that people remember the heroes, do not forget about them and learn life from their example.
In other words, heroes, that is, those people whom society recognizes as such, give society the direction of its development.
If the hero is strong and courageous, then the people who follow his example will try to become the same.
If a hero is a great creator, then people who follow his example will try to do more useful things for others and for the Motherland.
If a hero is a warrior who sacrificed himself for the sake of his people, for the sake of the Motherland, then people who follow his example will be ready to stand up for the defense of the Motherland, to protect their loved ones and, if necessary, give their lives for the sake of the happiness of other people.
In any case, it has always been considered important that a hero is someone who has done something very useful for the country, for the people, done something important so that people live better, so that they have a happier future.
And this is understandable.
How can we understand if the authorities erect monuments to Judases, executioners, and Hitler’s henchmen? How can we understand if the authorities erect monuments not to the creators, but to the destroyers and destroyers, who caused the death of many people, sometimes millions of innocent people? What direction of development in this case is given to both the state and society? The direction towards death and destruction is what is important to understand!
Here is Yeltsin. What did he do? He played one of the most important roles in the destruction of the USSR. A sinister role. And a luxurious center was built for him, which was opened by the president himself.
Here is Mannerheim. He destroyed Leningraders in a brutal blockade. During this blockade, more than 600 thousand Leningraders died from hunger alone. How much must one hate Russia, how much one must hate the Russian people, in order to erect a memorial plaque to such an executioner! But the Russian leadership, led by Putin, went for it...
And don’t say that Putin has nothing to do with it: the presence of the Minister of Culture and the head of the presidential administration during the opening ceremony of the board of shame speaks for itself!
And that is not all. Not only does the government make heroes of the destroyers, those who contributed to the destruction of our Motherland - the USSR.
The Russian leadership, led by Putin, is doing everything to slander and smear the true heroes with mud.
Both Putin and Medvedev do not miss a single opportunity to throw mud at Lenin, Stalin and the USSR.
You can see more about this:
In the article “Bestial anti-Sovietism of the Russian government. Putin and Co.: a chronicle of decommunization":
In an article in “Putin on Stalin and the USSR”:
And the historical films that are now being released demonstrate that tendency: they represent a falsification of history, where executioners are praised and heroized (Admiral), and Stalin is either demonized (all those tired of the sun) or he (as well as the USSR) seems to not exist (28 Panfilov's men).
The fact that the authorities demonstrate hatred of everything Soviet can be somehow understood: traitors always hate those whom they betrayed...
But here’s what the Russian heroes did not please the authorities: Ilya Muromets (and after all, they are canonized!), Dobrynya Nikitich and Alyosha Popovich... The very fact that these heroes, these heroes of the Russian land are ridiculed and the authorities turn a blind eye to this says about the Russophobia of the Russian authorities.
And how is the life of these heroes, these defenders of the Russian land presented to children? And through the cartoons “Alyosha Popovich and Tugarin the Serpent”, “Dobrynya Nikitich and the Serpent Gorynych”, “Ilya Muromets and the Nightingale the Robber”, where these heroes look like comic characters, like Mickey Mouse or SpongeBob.
How is this possible, why do they appear on screens in this form? Why is the church silent when a righteous hero, canonized as a Saint, is exposed to public ridicule? Where is the respect for our history, why are our heroes, instead of serving as an example for children and youth, simply ridiculed? Such mockery of our history must be stopped immediately, and such “masterpieces” must be banned from display.
But under the current Russophobic government one cannot even dream of this. The abomination shown on the screen, both regarding the heroes of the Great Patriotic War and the heroes of earlier times, only continues to multiply.
In general, the facts are clear: the enemies of Russia by the current government are exalted, and the heroes, on whose examples the people should be educated, are slandered and ridiculed.
I have already said what the goal of such a policy is - the elimination of all spiritual bonds that bind people into a people, the destruction of the Russian people and the transformation of the people into selfish grains of sand - a population not connected in any way with each other, devoid of any common spiritual bonds.
This is exactly what the Russian leadership, led by Putin, is actively doing.
We’ll talk about other programs of genocide of the Russian people next time, in the next article of this series.
2. Genocide of the Russian people
For three hundred years the Russian people were under the Tatar-Mongol yoke. Since 1917, Russia and the Russian people fell under the Jewish yoke.
The Tatars did not offend the religious feelings of the Orthodox, did not desecrate or destroy churches. They left power to the Russian princes and collected only tribute. They did not concern the culture of the people, their spiritual values.
The Jewish yoke is incomparable in its cruelty and inhumanity with the invasion of the Tatar-Mongols. Jewry is committing genocide of the Russian people, seized property created by the labor of many generations of the peoples of the country, finances, the press, destroyed and desecrated Orthodox churches and churches, and is imposing its culture, morality and ethics.
Almost a century after the October Revolution of 1917, it seems to us that its assessment by political figures of that time is very relevant. This is what Comrade (Deputy - A.P.) Chief Prosecutor of the Holy Synod, Prince N.D., wrote. Zhevakhov: “The task of the revolution of 1917 was the destruction of Russia and the formation on its territory... of a stronghold for the subsequent conquest of Western European Christian states... Ahead stood the persecution of the Orthodox Church, the theft of Russia's untold riches, the wholesale extermination of the Christian population, torment, torture, executions, resurrections long-forgotten pages of history, which were remembered only by people specially marked by God... The Monk Seraphim of Sarov, Iliodor of Glinsky, John of Kronstadt and lay sages, one list of whose names could fill a whole book, warned about the coming of this moment, but no one believed them...
And when this long-foreseen moment came, they not only did not recognize it, but on the contrary, they thought that a “new” Russia was being built by “new” people, “new ideals” were being created, “new paths” were being indicated to achieve “new goals” ...
In reality, there was a return to such a hoary old thing, covered with centuries-old dust, what was happening was not a “class” struggle, or a struggle of “labor with capital,” it was not these stupid slogans designed for the ignorance of the masses that triumphed, but there was a very real, cynically frank struggle of Judaism with Christianity, one of those old attempts to conquer the world... which took its roots in the ancient pagan philosophy of the Chaldean sages and began even before the coming of Christ the Savior to earth, repeating itself countless times in history with the same means and techniques.”
Indeed, in all troubles and revolutions, including English and French, the methods were the same. The main blow was dealt to the legitimate government, the state-forming nation and the church.
After the overthrow of the autocracy and the seizure of power, Jewry launched a struggle against the Russian people as the state-forming nation. Realizing that they did not have enough strength to destroy the Orthodox with a frontal attack, they used a method proven in both England and France - the Civil War. That is, they set one part of the people against another.
All the years of the First World War V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin) and his Jewish “guard” advocated turning the imperialist war into a civil war. In a speech at a meeting of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee in 1918, L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) stated: “Our party is for the Civil War. The civil war came down to bread. Long live the Civil War!
During the Civil War unleashed by the Jews in 1918–1922, 939,755 soldiers and commanders of the Red Army died. About the same number died on the white side. But basically these were Russian people. Almost 2 million died in fighting in the name of Jewish domination alone!
Already on June 16, 1918, Jews legally restored the death penalty, although before the seizure of power they were its main opponents.
In order to strengthen the Jewish dictatorship, in the spring of 1918, 205 newspapers that were objectionable to Jews were closed. Here you have freedom of speech and freedom of the press, which is what Jewry speculated on in the Russian Empire and is speculating on today in the Russian Federation - Russia.
The Soviets of Kaluga, Tver, Yaroslavl, Ryazan, Kostroma, Saratov, Penza, Tambov, Orel, Voronezh, Vologda, that is, the Soviets of Russian provinces where the Jews did not have a majority, were dissolved. They sent their fellow tribesmen there.
The Russian peasantry had little desire to fight for the interests of the Jewish occupiers. In 1919–1920, there were 3.5 million deserters in the country. Special detachments of the Cheka were created to catch them. In 1919 they caught 500 thousand people, in 1920 - 700–800 thousand. Tens of thousands were shot.
The favorite method of Jews in the fight against desertion was hostage-taking. Let us cite one of the reports from the departments of the Jewish Cheka dated June 23, 1919: “...The families of deserters of the Peter and Paul volost of the Yaroslavl province were taken as hostages. When they began to shoot a man in each family, the green ones began to come out of the forest and surrender. 34 armed deserters were shot.”
A similar report from the Lebedyansky district of the Tambov province: “On April 30, an uprising of kulaks and deserters broke out on the basis of the mobilization of people and horses, and the accounting of grain. The uprising went under the slogan “Down with the communists!” Down with the Soviets!“. The 212th detachment of internal troops arrived and liquidated the uprising. 60 people were arrested, 50 were shot on the spot, the village from where the uprising broke out was burned.” With such measures, the Jews drove Russian peasants into the Red Army, forcing them to obey the invaders.
A song was written for the Red Army soldiers:
We will boldly go into battle
For the power of the Soviets
And we will die as one
In the fight for it.
The White Army sang another song to the same tune:
We will boldly go into battle
For Holy Rus'
And we will kill all the Jews,
Such a bastard...
Protest against Jewish dominance and the “waiting” of the country was also expressed in the Red Army.
By decree of the People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) for outrage over the Jewish occupation of Russia, on May 27, 1918, the head of the naval forces of the Baltic Fleet, captain of the first rank A.M., was arrested. Shchastny. The only prosecutor in the Supreme Tribunal of the Republic (there are only Jews there - A.P.) was the Jew L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky). Naturally, there was no protection. A.M. Shchastny was shot.
The commander of the second cavalry army, Philip Kuzmich Mironov, sent V.I. A letter to Ulyanov (Lenin), in which he expressed indignation at the policies of Jews towards the Russian people. The letter said: “The social life of the Russian people... must be built in accordance with their historical, everyday and religious traditions and worldview, and the future must be left to time.”
September 13, 1919 L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) in connection with this issued an order: “...As a traitor and traitor, Mironov is outlawed. Every citizen who gets in Mironov's way is obliged to shoot him like a dog. Death to the traitor!
However, V.I. Ulyanov (Lenin) F.K. Mironov defended. He talked with him for two hours and promoted him to his position. Under the command of F.K. Mironov's troops of the Red Army defeated the army of P.N. Wrangel and captured Crimea.
However, Jewry did not forgive him for his anti-Jewish statements. In 1920, by order of L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) put him in Butyrka prison, where on April 2, 1921, without any trial, he was shot.
The talented military leader and commander of the Red Army of the North Caucasus, Ivan Lukich Sorokin, also tragically died. On October 13, 1918, on his orders, the chairman of the Central Executive Committee of the Caucasian Republic Rubin, his deputies Dunaevsky and Krainy, and the head of the Cheka Rozhansky were arrested for executions and bullying of Russians.
All of them are Jews and were shot for their crimes. November 1, 1918 L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) announced I.L. Sorokin is “outlaw”, he was killed by Jews.
They destroyed the commander of the first cavalry corps B.D. Dumenko. On February 24, 1920, together with the staff of the headquarters, he was arrested and executed on May 11. The first point of the accusation stated that they “carried out a Judeophobic and anti-Soviet policy, calling the leaders of the Red Army Jews.”
On August 30, 1919, division commander Nikolai Aleksandrovich Shchors was killed with a bullet to the back of the head. Shot him on the orders of L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) political inspector of the Revolutionary Military Council, Odessa Jew P.S. Tankhil-Tankhilevich for anti-Semitism among the division soldiers and the commander himself.
On December 9, 1919, on the border of Estonia and Soviet Russia, the commander of the 11th Infantry Regiment, Zunder, was killed during a firefight between Estonian and Bolshevik troops. His body ended up on the Estonian side. During a search in the pocket of his clothes, the Estonians found a document in Hebrew (in Yiddish - A.P.).
After a thorough examination by counterintelligence, the authenticity of the document was established and it was translated into Estonian. On December 31, his text was simultaneously published in two Estonian newspapers in Tallinn and Tartu - Teetaya and Postimaes.
After this, the “Sunder Document” gained international fame: “Secret. Representatives of the departments of the “International Union of Israelis”. Children of Israel! The hour of our final victory is near. We are on the eve of world domination. What we could only dream about before is now becoming a reality. Weak and helpless just a short time ago, now, thanks to the general world collapse, we raise our heads with pride.
However, we must be careful, since it can be confidently predicted that, having stepped over the destroyed altars and thrones, we must move even further along the intended path. Through successful propaganda and revelations, we subjected the authority and beliefs of a religion alien to us to merciless criticism and ridicule. We have overthrown other people's shrines, we have shaken peoples and states from their culture and traditions. We have done everything to subjugate the Russian people
Jewish power and force it to finally kneel before us. We've almost achieved it all; however... we must be careful, since our original enemy is enslaved Russia. The victory over it, achieved by our genius, may someday be turned against us in new generations.
Russia has been thrown into the dust: it is under our dominion; but don't forget for a moment that we must be careful! The sacred concern for our safety does not allow us either compassion or mercy.
Finally we saw the poverty and tears of the Russian people! Having taken away their property and gold, we turned these people into miserable slaves. Be careful and silent. We must not have pity for our enemy: we must remove the best and leading elements from them, so that conquered Russia will not have a leader. By this we destroy any possibility of resisting our power. It is necessary to awaken party hatred and civil strife among peasants and workers. War and class struggle destroy the cultural treasures created by Christian peoples. But be careful, children of Israel! Our victory is close, as our political and economic power and our influence on the masses are increasing.
We buy government loans and gold and thereby dominate the world's exchanges. The power is in our hands, but be careful.
Don't trust deceptive dark forces! Bronstein, Apfelbaum, Rosenfeld, Steinberg - all of them, like many others, are faithful sons of Israel. Our power in Russia is unlimited. In cities, commissariats, food commissions, house committees, etc., representatives of our people play a leading role. And don’t get drunk with victory! Be careful because no one can protect us but ourselves!
Remember that you cannot rely on the Red Army, because it can turn its weapons against us.
Children of Israel! The hour is near when we will achieve the long-awaited victory over Russia! Close your ranks! Preach loudly the national policy of our people! Fight for our eternal ideals!
Central Committee
Petrograd department
International Union of Jews."
Jewry not only split the Russian army, pitting soldiers (workers and peasants - A.P.) against officers (military intelligentsia - A.P.), not only unleashed the Civil War between Russians and Russians, but also organized civil strife within certain segments of the Russian population.
In May 1918, Chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee Ya.M. Royd (Sverdlov) set the task of “splitting the village into two irreconcilable hostile camps, restoring the rural poor against the rural bourgeoisie.” For this purpose, by decree of June 11, 1918, committees of the poor (kombedas) were created throughout the country. Jewish instructions to the committees demanded the destruction of able-bodied peasants in Russia. Destroy, take away, capture - this is the traditional Jewish policy with the help of which the bloody drama of the Russian village was brewed.
To requisition food from the peasants, the Jews formed an 80,000-strong food army by 1920. The confiscation of food from peasants led to mass famine in Ukraine, the Volga region, the North Caucasus and a number of regions of the Non-Black Earth Region. On July 21, 1921, the Jewish government of Russia created the All-Russian Committee for Famine Relief. Its functions included searching for food and medicine in Russia and abroad, distributing this aid among the hungry, establishing local committees, etc... The Russian Orthodox Church began to provide assistance to the committee.
The committee was soon dissolved. The Deputy Chairman of the Cheka is the cousin of F.E.’s wife. Dzerzhinsky Sophia Mushkat Jew Joseph Unschlikht stated that “he was the center of attraction for Russian society. We cannot allow this." Let the Russians die of hunger, but Jewry will not allow the creation of even a humanitarian center that unites them.
Instead of a committee, the Jews created the Famine Relief Commission (Famine Relief Commission) through the American Relief Association (ARA) headed by J. Edgar Hoover.
The famine of 1921–1922 affected an area of 30 million people. Only 3 million were helped. As a result, 5 million people died of starvation, and there were no Jews among them. In this regard, it is appropriate to compare the food of the Jewish occupiers of Russia: “We settled with Lenin across the corridor,” wrote L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky). The dining room was common. The food in the Kremlin was very bad back then. Instead of meat they gave us corned beef. Flour and cereals were filled with sand. Only red chum caviar was in abundance due to the cessation of exports. It is not only in my memory that the first years of the revolution are colored with this unchanging caviar.”
Hundreds of thousands of Russian people died from a famine organized by Jews, and Jewish leaders gorged themselves on red caviar.
At the beginning of 1929, the original plan was approved. collectivization. In accordance with it, 5 million peasant farms or 20% of the total were to join collective farms. In June of the same year, this figure was increased to 8 million, and in September to 13. At the end of October, the Pravda newspaper announced complete collectivization.
All wealthy peasants (kulaks, as the Jews called them - A.P.) were divided into 3 categories. The first is those who fought against collectivization. This category was charged with counter-revolutionary activities. They were subject to arrest and placement in concentration camps. Their families without property were evicted to the northern regions of the country. The second is those who did not fight against collectivization, but also did not approve of it. They were subject to deportation to the northern regions along with their families. The third category is those who were loyal to collectivization. They were subject to eviction along with their family and property to the same province, but outside the zone of collective farms.
Directive No. 44/21 of the People's Commissar of Internal Affairs of the Jew Hanoch Enoch Yehudi (Yagoda) ordered the immediate arrest of 60 thousand fists of the first category.
On January 20, 1930, the bureau of the Middle Volga Regional Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, headed by the Jew Mendel Khataevich, at a closed meeting adopted a resolution “On the seizure and eviction of counter-revolutionary elements and kulaks from the village.” Here is this document:
"1. Immediately carry out a massive operation throughout the region to remove 3,000 active counter-revolutionary anti-Soviet and terrorist elements from the village. This operation should be completed by February 5th.
2. At the same time, begin preparations for the mass eviction of kulak-White Guard elements along with their families, carrying out this operation from February 5 to 15.
A week later, the Jewish leadership of the Middle Volga region decided to arrest not 3 thousand, but up to 5 thousand, and evict not 10 thousand, but 15 thousand Russian peasant farms.
On January 31, 1930, on behalf of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks in Samara M.M. A telegram was sent to Khataevich: “Your haste on the kulak issue has nothing to do with party policy. You get the voice of dispossession in its worst form. Stalin, Molotov, Kaganovich."
Similar reprisals against the Russian, Ukrainian, Kazakh and other peoples were carried out by the leader of the Siberian Territory, the Latvian Jew Robert Eichs, the leader of the Ukrainian SSR S. Kosior, the head of the Kazakh ASSR, one of the organizers of the murder of the Tsar and his family, the Jew Shaya Goloshchekin, the head of the Central Black Earth Region, the Lithuanian Jew Juozas Vareikis , head of the Moscow region, Latvian Jew Karl Bauman.
On March 2, 1930, the actions of these Jewish executioners were condemned in an article by I.V. Dzhugashvili (Stalin) “Dizziness from success” in the newspaper “Pravda”.
Collectivization was also led by Jews from Moscow. The People's Commissar of Agriculture was Yakov Arkadyevich Epshtein (Yakovlev). By the decision of the November 1929 Plenum of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, he was approved as chairman of the special commission on collectivization. The initiator of speeding up collectivization and the author of all directives was the head of the collective farm center, the Jew G. Kaminsky. The state farms were in charge of the Jew M. Kalmaovich.
These Jewish satraps exiled more than 2 million Russian and Ukrainian peasants, of which 1 million 800 thousand in 1930–1931. Hundreds of thousands of them perished in concentration camps. Between 1931 and 1933, 6 million people died as a result of famine.
Isn't this the genocide of the Russian peasantry? Soon all these Jewish stranglers of the Russian people will themselves be destroyed.
Jewry felt intense hatred for the Cossacks. The Cossacks have always guarded the interests of the Russian state. They resolutely suppressed any Jewish attempts to organize unrest or offend the Orthodox. They were also the guardians of Russian culture, morality and ethics.
Having seized power in Russia, Jewry immediately began the fight against the Cossacks. Already in December 1917, the Cossacks were deprived of their traditional status. Their lands were confiscated and transferred to settlers and local peasants. Again the favorite Jewish method: “divide and conquer.”
Under threat of death, the Cossacks were forced to surrender their weapons, although they had the right to carry them. All stanitsa and district bodies of Cossack self-government were dissolved.
January 24, 1919 Chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, Secretary of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) Ya.M. Royd (Sverdlov) signed a secret directive from the Organizing Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP(b): “Taking into account the experience of the civil war against the Cossacks, recognize the only correct political move as mass terror against the rich Cossacks, exterminating them without exception. Carry out merciless mass terror against all Cossacks who took any direct or indirect part in the fight against the Soviet (or rather Jewish - A.P.) power.” Only one chairman of the Don Revolutionary Committee, Jew Reingold, from February to mid-March 1920 destroyed more than 8 thousand Cossacks.
Isn't this the genocide of the Russian Cossacks? But today’s “human rights fighters,” the grandchildren of the Jewish executioners of the Cossacks, are silent about the crimes of their grandparents. Apparently, numerous Jewish “democratic” parties and organizations are interested in the rights of only their “God’s chosen people.”
In response to the extermination, an uprising of the Cossacks of Veshensky and other districts began in March 1919. By the beginning of April, in the rear of the Red Army, which was fighting with the army of A.I. Denikin and the Kuban Cossacks, the number of rebels reached 30 thousand people. In the appeal they wrote: “We, Cossacks, are not against the Soviets. We are for freely elected Soviets. We are against communists, communes and Jews. We are against requisitioning, robbery and outrages caused by the Bolynevitsky secret police.”
After the suppression of the uprising, the Jewish leadership of Russia decided to kill the Cossacks with the “bony hand of hunger.” They actively applied this method to peasants. An indemnity of 36 million poods of grain was imposed on the Cossacks of the Don region. Literally everything was taken from them. The Cossacks fought for their survival through guerrilla warfare. There were up to 35 thousand Cossacks among the partisans.
“Troikas” for decossackization were created locally. In October 1920 alone, these “troikas” destroyed more than 6 thousand Cossacks. As against the peasants, the Jews used hostages in the fight against the Cossack partisan detachments. “The hostages - women, children, old people,” said Latvian Jew Martyn Latsis, a member of the Cheka board, “are isolated in a camp near Maykop, surviving in terrible conditions, in the cold, October mud... They are dying like flies, Women are ready to do anything to save, and the shooters guarding the camp will take advantage of this.” Orders and reports to the departments of the Cheka testify to Jewish atrocities against the Russian Cossacks. Here, for example, is an order from November 1920:
"1. Burn the village of Kalinovskaya;
2. The villages of Ermolaevskaya, Romanovskaya, Samashinskaya and Mikhailovskaya should be given to the poorest landless population and, first of all, to the mountainous Chechens who were always loyal to the Soviet government, for which:
Z. The entire male population of the above-mentioned villages from 18 to 50 years old should be loaded into trains and sent under escort to the North for hard forced labor;
4. Elderly people, women and children should be evicted from the villages, allowing them to move to farmsteads or villages in the North;
5. Horses, cows, sheep and other livestock, as well as suitable property, should be transferred to the Cavalry Army.”
Of the 3 million Cossacks in Russia, the Jews killed and deported about 500 thousand, that is, every sixth.
One of the main and primary tasks of the Jewish invaders was the elimination of the cementing force of the Russian people, the ideological basis of their morality, ethics and culture - the Orthodox Church. On January 23, 1918, they adopted the “Decree on the separation of church and state and schools from church.” This document announced the nationalization of church property.
Jewish experts opened the relics of saints and took their remains to different parts of the country. They planned to turn the Trinity-Sergius Lavra, where the relics of Sergius of Radonezh were located, into a central museum of atheism. The Lavra was desecrated by its renaming in honor of the secretary of the Moscow Committee of the RCP (b), a member of the political commission for the leadership of the Central Headquarters of Moscow's special forces, the Jew V.M. Zagorsky (real name Lubotsky - A.P.). For several decades, the shrine of Russia was called the city of Zagorsk.
The goal of Jewry was not only the liquidation of the Orthodox Church, but also the implantation of its religion, that is, the Judaization of Russia.
In 1921, the Dane Hennig Köhler published a book in Berlin called “The Red Garden”. It tells how the monument to the traitor of Jesus Christ, Judas Iscariot, was unveiled in the city of Sviyazhsk.
Residents of the city were herded to the square in front of the station. They were surrounded by the Jewish crew of the armored train. When the veil was removed, a brown-red plaster figure with a distorted face turned to the sky was revealed to people's eyes, tearing the rope from its neck. On the pedestal there was an inscription: “To the man who was despised by capitalist society for two thousand years, the forerunner of the world revolution - Judas Iscariot.”
According to the testimony of X. Koehler, the crowd was indignant, spat, and crossed themselves. Judas was despised, of course, not by capitalist society, but by Christians in all centuries. And not only Christians. Traitors are despised among all nations. X. Köhler rightly asks the question: “If this is not a challenge to God and not a hymn to Satan, then what?” Maybe today the Jewish gentlemen will answer this question from the Dane?
On February 26, 1922, a decree of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee was published in the Izvestia newspaper, according to which local Soviets were obliged to confiscate gold, silver, and precious stones in churches and monasteries within a month. During this operation, 2,691 priests, 1,962 monks, and 3,447 nuns were killed. In the city of Shuya, fire was opened on believers, resulting in the death of 12 people.
IN AND. Ulyanov (Lenin) said that hunger would help deliver a “death blow to the head of the enemy,” that is, the Orthodox Church. “I come to the unconditional conclusion - now to give the most decisive and merciless battle to the Black Hundred clergy and suppress their resistance with such cruelty that they will not forget this for several decades.” And this is the instruction of the Jew V.I. Ulyanov a (Lenin) was fulfilled. By 1923, 60 thousand of the 100 thousand Russian Orthodox priests were destroyed.
To fight the Russian Orthodox Church, Jewry formed in 1925 the Central Council of the Union of Militant Atheists. Here is its composition:
Yaroslavsky Emelyan - chairman (“maiden name” Miney Izrailevich Gubelman)
Lukachsvsky A. - Deputy
Likhnevich D. - Head of the Personnel Training Department
Kefala M. - head of the department of propaganda and anti-religious work
Pekingsky M. - head of the department of anti-religious studies in schools
Yakovlev M. - head of the department of anti-religious literature (Epstein)
Struchkov G. - head of the department of anti-religious work in the army (Bloch)
Dukachevsky L. - head of the research department
Kogan Yu. - Head of the Museum of the Struggle against Religion
The most active leaders of the union:
Eilderman G.
Dorfman V.
Vermel Yu.M.
Minkin A.
Altshuler M.
Mitin Solomon
Berkovsky K.
Raltsevich
Persits M.
Ranovich A.
Wolfson S.
Kozlinsky V.
Zilberberg S.
Kozlevsky A.
Shliter Aron
Sheinman M.M.
Greenberg, etc.
Every single one on this list is Jewish. They created a whole network of newspapers and magazines to fight the Russian Orthodox Church: “Atheist”, “Militant Atheism”, “Atheist at the Machine”, “Anti-religious”, “Young Atheists”, etc.
On Orthodox holidays they organized anti-religious carnivals.
Russian priests and other clergy were deprived of all civil rights. They could not participate in elections, could not receive food cards, were deprived of free medical care, and were oppressed with taxes.
In April 1929, a resolution was adopted to further restrict the activities of religious associations. Any activity that goes beyond satisfying religious needs, the resolution said, carries a criminal penalty of three years to death for “using religious prejudice to weaken the state.”
In October 1929, the Jewish leadership ordered the removal of the bells from the remaining churches. “The ringing of bells violates the right of the broad atheistic masses of cities and villages to a well-deserved rest,” this directive mockingly stated.
In 1930 alone, 13 thousand clergy of the Russian Orthodox Church were repressed and 6,715 churches were closed.
The Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks condemned the closure of churches without the consent of parishioners, but Jews continued their fight against God and even blew up the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow.
On April 1, 1936, out of 112,629 churches in 1914, only 15,835 remained. With the defeat of the Zionist-Jewish elite, the number of churches began to increase since 1938. The civil rights of clergy were restored, unions of militant atheists, anti-religious newspapers and magazines were liquidated, and in 1944 the Patriarchate was restored.
From the very first days of the seizure of power in Russia, Jewry unleashed real terror against the entire Russian people. On November 10, 1917, the Military Revolutionary Committee of Petrograd introduced the concept of “Enemy of the People.” Although the enemy of which people was not specified, soon all the peoples of Russia felt Jewish hatred and vindictiveness the hard way.
Addressing the members of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee on December 14, 1917, L.D. Bronstein (Troitsky) said: “No later than in a month, terror will take, like what happened during the Great French Revolution, a very cruel form. Then we will not be talking about prisons, but about the guillotine, this wonderful invention of the Great French Revolution, which has the generally recognized advantage of shortening a person by a head.” These Zionist-fascist invaders “shortened” 60 million Russian people.
“No imagination can imagine the picture of these tortures. People were stripped naked, their hands were tied with rope and hung from crossbars so that their feet barely touched the ground, and then they were slowly and gradually shot from machine guns, rifles or revolvers. The machine gunner first crushed the legs so that they could not support the body, then aimed at the arms and in this form left his victim hanging, bleeding... Having enjoyed the torment of the sufferers, he began to shoot them again in different places until the living person turned into into the bloody mass and only after that finished it off with a shot to the forehead. The invited “guests” sat right there and admired the executions, drinking wine, smoking and playing the piano or balalaikas...
Skinning of living people was often practiced, for which they were thrown into boiling water, cuts were made on the neck and around the hands, the skin was pulled off with tongs, and then thrown out into the cold... This method was practiced in the Kharkov Emergency, headed by the Jew “Comrade Edward” and convict Sayenko. After the Bolsheviks were expelled from Kharkov, the Volunteer Army discovered many “gloves” in the basements of the Cheka. This was the name given to skin torn off from hands along with nails. Excavations of the pits where the bodies of the dead were thrown revealed traces of some kind of monstrous operation on the genitals, the essence of which even the best Kharkov surgeons could not determine... On the corpses of former officers, in addition, shoulder straps on the shoulders, on the forehead were cut out with a knife or burned out by fire - Soviet star, and on the chest - order insignia; noses, lips, ears were cut off... On the female corpses there were cut off breasts and nipples, etc., etc. Many people were flooded in the basements of the emergency, where the unfortunate were driven and then the water taps were opened.
In St. Petersburg, the head of the Cheka was the Latvian Jew Peter, who was later transferred to Moscow. Upon assuming the position of “chief of internal defense,” he immediately shot over 1000 people, and ordered the corpses to be thrown into the Neva, where the bodies of the officers he shot in the Peter and Paul Fortress were also thrown. By the end of 1917, there were still several tens of thousands of officers left in St. Petersburg who had survived the war, and more than half of them were shot by Peters and then by the Jew Uritsky. Even according to Soviet data, which is clearly false, Uritsky shot over 5,000 officers.
Transferred to Moscow, Peter, who, among other assistants, had the Latvian Jewess Krause, literally flooded the entire city with blood. There is no way to convey everything that is known about this beast woman and her sadism. They said that she terrified with her mere appearance, that she awed with her unnatural excitement... She mocked her victims, inventing the most cruel types of torture, mainly in the genital area, and stopped them only after complete exhaustion and the onset of a sexual reaction. The objects of her torment were mainly young men, and no pen can convey what this Satanist performed with her victims, what operations she performed on them... Suffice it to say that such operations lasted for hours and she stopped them only after those writhing in suffering young people turned into bloody corpses with eyes frozen in horror...
In Kyiv, the employees of the Jewish Cheka “Comrade Vera”, Rosa Schwartz and other girls were widely known.
There were fifty emergency rooms here, but the most terrible were three, one of which was located on Ekaterininskaya Street, No. 5... In one of the basements of the emergency room, I don’t remember exactly which one, a kind of theater was set up, where chairs were placed for lovers of bloody spectacles, and on the stage , that is, on the stage, which was supposed to represent a stage, executions were carried out.
After each successful shot, shouts of “bravo” and “encore” were heard and glasses of champagne were brought to the executioners. Rosa Schwartz personally killed several hundred people, previously squeezed into a box with a hole for the head on the top platform. But shooting at a target was only a comic amusement for these girls and did not excite their dull nerves. They demanded more acute sensations, and for this purpose Rosa and “Comrade Vera” poked out their eyes with needles, or burned them with a cigarette, or hammered thin nails under their nails.
In Kyiv, they whispered Rosa Schwartz’s favorite order, which was so often heard in the bloody dungeons of the Cheka, when nothing could drown out the heartbreaking cries of the tortured: “Fill his throat with hot tin so that he doesn’t squeal like a pig.”... And this order was carried out with literal precision...
Rosa and Vera were especially furious with those who were caught in the emergency situation and found a pectoral cross on them. After incredible mockery of religion, they tore down these crosses and burned the image of the cross with fire on the chest or forehead of their victims...
When the imagination in inventing methods of execution was exhausted, then the sufferers were thrown onto the floor and, with blows of a heavy hammer, their heads were broken in half with such force that the brain was squeezed out onto the floor. This was practiced in the emergency room, located on Sadovaya, 5, where soldiers of the Volunteer Army discovered a barn, the asphalt floor of which was literally littered with human brains.
In Poltava, the Jewish security officer “Grishka” went on a rampage, practicing a method of torture unheard of in terms of brutality. He severely executed 18 monks, ordering them to be imprisoned on a sharpened stake driven into the ground. The security officers of Yamburg also used the same method, where all the officers and soldiers captured on the Narva Front were impaled.
No pen can describe the torment of the sufferers, who did not die immediately, but several hours later, writhing in unbearable pain. Some suffered even for more than a day. The corpses of these great martyrs were a stunning sight: almost all of their eyes came out of their sockets...
In Blagoveshchensk, all victims of the emergency had gramophone needles stuck under their fingernails and toenails.
In Omsk, even pregnant women were tortured, their bellies were torn out and their intestines pulled out.
In Kazan, the Urals and Yekaterinburg, the unfortunate were crucified on crosses, burned at the stake, or thrown into hot furnaces...”
These are quoted excerpts from the memoirs of N.D. Zhevakhova.
The crimes of the German fascists pale in comparison to the crimes of the Zionist-Jewish occupiers against the Russians and other peoples of our country. Only the former were judged by the International Tribunal, while the latter continue to fatten on the blood and misfortunes of Russia.
The report to the chairman of the Supreme Tribunal said: “Those who have not paid the full tax are driven bound and barefoot along the main street of the village and then locked in a cold barn.
They beat women until they lose consciousness, and lower them naked into holes dug in the snow.”
Former correspondent of the newspaper “Russkie Vedomosti” Sergei Petrovich Melgunov, forced to leave his homeland, published the book “Red Terror in Russia 1918–1923.” Here are some excerpts from this book, compiled on the basis of documents from investigative commissions of the White armies and testimony.
“Teacher Dombrovskaya was tortured in solitary confinement in prison... She had previously been raped and mocked. Rape occurred according to seniority of rank. The security officer Friedman was the first to rape, then the others. After that, they tortured her, extracting from her a confession about where the gold was hidden. First, they cut into the naked woman’s body with a knife, then they pressed off the extremities of her fingers with iron tongs and pliers. Enduring incredible torment, bleeding, the unfortunate woman pointed out some place in the barn of house No. 28 on Medvedevskaya Street, where she lived. At 9 o'clock in the evening on November 6th she was shot..."
“In Simferopol,” says a correspondent of the same newspaper, “the Cheka use a new type of torture, arranging enemas of broken glass and placing burning candles under the genitals. In Tsaritsyn they used to put the person being tortured on a hot frying pan, they also used iron rods, rubber with metal tips, twisted their arms, broke bones...”
“In Kyiv, the tortured person was tied to a wall or pole; then an iron pipe several inches wide was tightly tied to it at one end... A rat was put into it through another hole, the hole was immediately closed with a wire mesh and fire was brought to it. Driven into despair by the heat, the animal began to eat into the unfortunate man’s body in order to find a way out. Such torture lasted for hours, sometimes until the next day, until the victim died...”
“Odessa Vikhman shoots in the cells themselves at his own request, although he had 6 special executioners at his disposal...”
“In Arkhangelsk, Maizel-Kedrova personally shot 87 officers, 33 ordinary people, sank a barge with 500 refugees and soldiers of Muller’s army, etc.....”
“In Odessa, officers were tortured, tied with chains to boards, slowly inserted into a firebox and fried, others were torn in half by the wheels of winches, others were lowered in turn into a cauldron of boiling water and into the sea, and then thrown into the firebox...”
“On March 23, 1919, an English military chaplain reported to Lord Curzon: “In the last days of August, two barges filled with officers were sunk, and their corpses were thrown out on the estate of one of my friends, located on the Gulf of Finland: many were tied up in twos and threes.” barbed wire...”
The most cruel executioner was an investigator of the Leningrad NKVD department in 1930–1938. Sophia Gertner. Her mentor was the Leningrad security officer Yakov Mekler, who was given the nickname “Butcher.” This Jewish monster tied up the arrested man and hit him on the manhood with a shoe, for which she received the nickname “Sonka the Golden Leg.” Publishing this information in the newspaper “Arguments and Facts” (No. 19, 1993), editor Starkov could proudly add that this is his fellow tribesman. But he modestly kept silent about the nationality of Sophia Gertner and her mentor Yakov Mekler.
It was already mentioned above about the massacres of soldiers and officers of the army of P.N. Wrangel. If they surrendered, they were promised life and freedom. However, more than 100 thousand of them were brutally killed and drowned in the Black Sea. This genocide was led by Jews Bela Kun and Rosa Zalkind (Zemlyachka).
By order of L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) every tenth Red Army soldier of the second Petrograd workers' regiment was shot. The reason for such a brutal order was the forced retreat of the regiment in the Sviyazhsk area.
In June 1918, the chairman of the provincial Cheka, one of the members of the Jewish Merkaz (Center) of Russia, M.S., was killed in Petrograd. Uritsky. He was shot by the same Jewish student L. Kanegiesser. Before that, they often met and played chess. Many believe that these were two Jewish homosexuals. In connection with the murder of M.S. Uritsky in Petrograd, 10 thousand Russian officers, officials, and workers were shot. A homosexual Jew kills his Jewish partner, and 10 thousand innocent people are shot! Among the 10 thousand there was not a single Jew.
In Moscow, on August 30, 1918, the Jewish woman Fanny Royd (Kaplan) wounded the Jew V.I. Ulyanov a (Lenina). As a result, “Red Terror” was declared in the country. In Moscow alone, 10 thousand Russian officers, employees, and workers were killed. A Jewish woman shoots a Jew, and the Russian people suffer!
For only 2 hours, 22 dead and wounded soldiers of Wrangel’s army remained in the village of Chernigovka, Berdyansk district, after the retreat of their unit. After 2 hours, as a result of a counterattack, the village was liberated.
On all 22 bodies, the palms and feet were pierced (like Jesus Christ - A.P.), the left sides were pierced (such a wound was inflicted on Jesus by a Roman guard - A.P.) and a strip of skin was torn off on the foreheads (for Christ this is a trace of thorns). crown - A.P.).
The analysis showed that ritual blasphemy was carried out both over corpses and over still living people.
In response to hunger, requisitions, and the anti-Russian and anti-Orthodox policies of the Zionist-Jewish invaders, uprisings and strikes took place throughout Russia. In Yaroslavl, having suppressed the uprising, the Moscow Cheka detachment shot 428 people.
At the beginning of March 1919, workers took control of the Putilov plant. On March 12, V.I. arrived in Petrograd. Ulyanov (Lenin). When he tried to speak to the factory workers, he was met with whistles and shouts: “Down with the Jews and the commissars!” Before him, the Putilov workers met G.A. in the same way. Apfelbaum (Zinoviev).
On March 16, detachments of the Petrograd Cheka stormed the Putilov plant. Two hundred strikers were shot in the Shlisselburg fortress, 900 workers were arrested.
Uprisings and strikes took place in Tula, Sormovo, Orel, Tver, Bryansk, Ivanovo-Voznesensk, and Astrakhan.
In Orel, Bryansk, Tomsk, and Astrakhan, Red Army units joined the strikers. Demonstrations and rallies on the streets were held under the slogans: “Beat the Jews!” Down with the Bolshevik commissars!“.
F.E. personally came to Tula with a detachment of the Cheka to liquidate the strike at arms factories. Dzerzhinsky. On his orders, 26 “ringleaders” were shot and 800 people were arrested. Hundreds of workers were fired and their ration cards were banned. That is, people were doomed to starvation.
On March 10, 1919, in Astrakhan, Red Army soldiers of the 45th Infantry Regiment refused to shoot at the workers and joined them. The arriving Cheka detachments on March 12–14 loaded the arrested workers and soldiers onto barges and threw them into the Volga with stones around their necks. In total, up to 4 thousand people were destroyed and shot.
Mass protests of workers and peasants took place in Ukraine. The slogans of demonstrations and rallies were the same: “For councils without Muscovites and Jews!”
Discontent was caused not only by hunger and Jewish bullying, but also by their attempts to turn workers into ordinary slaves.
One of the Jewish leaders L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) planned to make Russia a huge barracks, to introduce barracks conditions for Russian workers. This theory of his was called the “militarization of labor.” In 1919–1920 more than two thousand large enterprises were placed under martial law.
According to official data from the People's Commissariat of Labor, in 1920, 77 percent of large and medium-sized enterprises participated in the strike movement against hunger, cold, Jewish dominance and unprecedented mockery of the religion, customs and traditions of the Russian people.
In 1920, peasant uprisings swept across the country. They took on a special scale in the Voronezh, Samara, Astrakhan, Saratov, Penza provinces, and in many regions of Siberia.
The peasants of the Tambov province offered fierce resistance to the Jewish authorities. Since the autumn of 1918, more than 100 food detachments plundered the villages of the Tambov region. In 1920, instead of 18 million poods according to the allocation, Tambov peasants had to hand over 27 million poods of grain. This meant their death by starvation.
August 19, 1920 in the village. Khitrovo peasants defeated a food detachment that was robbing and beating old men and women. The uprising covered 3 districts of the Tambov region. The uprising was led by the chief of police of the Kirsanovsky district of the Tambov province, Alexander Stepanovich Antonov. By the end of 1920, there were 50 thousand peasants in his army. The slogan of the uprising was: “For councils without Jews and communists!”
To organize the suppression of the uprising, the Jewish Soviet government created an authorized commission of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, headed by V.A. Antonov-Ovseenko. Its composition was 90 percent Jewish.
After the liquidation of the army P.N. Wrangel, 100 thousand Red Army soldiers were sent to suppress the “Antonovism”. Together with them, 3 regiments of the Moscow division of the Cheka and special forces units of the Cheka from other provinces took part in the suppression of the rebellious Tambov peasants.
M.N. was appointed commander of all armed forces of the Tambov province. Tukhachevsky. This “most talented,” “outstanding” commander of the Red Army, as Jewish authors describe him in all textbooks, was in fact an ordinary executioner of the Russian people.
This “talent”, together with his Jewish entourage, killed more than 70 thousand Red Army soldiers on the Western Front, when Polish troops completely defeated these “commanders”.
Now this “outstanding commander” fought against the Russian peasants of the Tambov region. Then he will suppress the rebel sailors of Kronstadt. The atrocities that M.N. What Tukhachevsky did with the rebels are war crimes and crimes against humanity. However, current Jewish “human rights activists” remain silent about this.
L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky) planned to appoint M.N. Tukhachevsky as chief of the General Staff of the world Soviet (Jewish - A.P.) Republic. Under N.S. Khrushchev and under M.S. Gorbachev's Jewry rehabilitated this executioner, which is an outrage against the memory of tens of thousands of peasants of the Tambov region and sailors of Kronstadt who were killed by him.
"1. Citizens who refuse to give their name are shot on the spot, without trial.
2. For villages in which weapons are hidden, the authority of the political commission or regional political commission shall announce a verdict on the seizure of hostages and shoot them if they do not surrender their weapons.
Z. If a hidden weapon is found, shoot on the spot without trial the senior worker in the family.
4. The family in whose house the bandit took refuge is subject to arrest and expulsion from the province, its property is confiscated, the senior worker in this family is shot without trial.
5. Families harboring family members or property of bandits should be shot as bandits, and the senior employee of this family should be shot on the spot without trial.
6. In the event of the escape of the bandit’s family, its property should be distributed among peasants loyal to Soviet power, and the houses left behind should be burned or dismantled.
7. This order must be implemented severely and mercilessly.”
From the book People's Monarchy author Solonevich IvanHISTORY OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE We build our program based on the real experience of our past. The whole difficulty of the question lies in this: what was our real past? Who gives the most accurate answer to this question? Prof. Whipper admitted that to study history
From the book Unknown Russia. A story that will surprise you author Uskov NikolayPrayer of the Russian people So, from the bedroom door into which Emperor Nicholas II entered on the night of July 19, 1914, we were transported 81 years ago, to December 6, 1833 (18th New Style), to a completely different country. To understand how different it is, just look around
author Lobanov Mikhail PetrovichLeon Trotsky on the destruction of the Russian people From the memoirs of A. L. Ratiev<…>
From the book Traditions of the Russian People author Kuznetsov I. N.HOLIDAYS AND BELIEFS OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE New Year among the ancient Russians All the ancients celebrated the New Year from the vernal equinox, that is, from the 7th day of March, but the festivities of this day began from the last days of February and concluded on the 6th day of March, precisely on the eve of the evening
From the book Thus Spoke Stalin. Conversations with the leader author Gusev AnatolyAbout the “submissiveness and laziness” of the Russian people (From a conversation between I.V. Stalin and the German writer E. Ludwig on December 13, 1931)Ludwig. I am extremely grateful to you for finding it possible to receive me. For more than 20 years I have been studying the life and work of outstanding historical
From the book Stalin in the memoirs of contemporaries and documents of the era author Lobanov Mikhail PetrovichLeon Trotsky on the destruction of the Russian people From the memoirs of A. L. Ratiev<…>The dimly lit hall of the Kursk Noble Assembly. On its left side there are rows of Viennese chairs. On the right is the stage podium. At its front edge, almost completely separating the stage from the audience, stand two
From the book Nuremberg warns author Joseph Hoffman11 Genocide of the Jewish People No other crime of the Third Reich has been studied so scrupulously, has not been discussed so thoroughly as this. Anti-Semites and so-called “revisionist historians” are trying their best to discredit and cast a shadow on the tragedy of the Jewish people.
From the book The Land of the Never Setting Sun [National policy of the Russian Empire and the self-name of the Russian people] author Bazhanov Evgeniy AlexandrovichChapter 13. THE UNION OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE There are two polar opinions about the character of the Russian people. One opinion, strengthened in the 19th century, about the imperiality of the Russian people, comes from the West. This abandoned image was also picked up by some political groups on the outskirts of the empire. Imperial
author Ilyin Ivan AlexandrovichAbout the suffering and humiliation of the Russian people Every Russian who loves his people and is proud of his culture has probably asked himself more than once: “Why is Russia destined to such a terrible fate? Why exactly does the Russian people have to endure such torment and humiliation? Why
From the book National Russia: Our Tasks author Ilyin Ivan AlexandrovichAbout educating the Russian people for justice Restoring Russia, healing the wounds of revolution and war, and strengthening the greatness and great power of our homeland can only be based on the spirit of justice and serving it. And for this it is necessary, first of all, to undeceitfully assure everyone
From the book Historical Truth and Ukrainophile Propaganda author Volkonsky Alexander MikhailovichThree branches of the Russian people Desolation of Kievan Rus We saw that before the invasion of the Tatars, a single nationality - the Russians - acted and dominated throughout the entire territory of what was then Russia. But we also saw that a hundred years after this invasion, from the 14th century, it occurs (for Galicia)
From the book History of World and Domestic Culture: Lecture Notes author Konstantinova S V4. Life of the Russian people New everyday forms of culture were implanted in the life of the noble elite. In 1700, mannequins with samples of new clothes for nobles (Hungarian, Saxon and French) were even exhibited at the Kremlin gates. The original figure of the king, who at first observed
From the book Breaking into the Future. From agony to dawn! author Kalashnikov MaximThe Russian people no longer exist. The Free Press continues the discussion “Russia for the Russians?”, in which representatives of various political forces express their point of view on the current situation of the Russian people, look for ways to overcome interethnic problems in
From the book A Word in Defense of Israel by Alan Dershowitz20. Did Israel commit genocide against the Palestinian people? AccusationIsrael is guilty of genocide of Palestinians and Arabs. Accusers“I would like to publicly propose here in Gaza, in Palestine - where the intifada began ten years ago at this time - that an Interim Government
I often wonder why we live so poorly? Why is it that man is a wolf to man? Why are the Russian people not respected throughout the world? And the worst thing is that the people do not respect themselves.
Now there is a real genocide against the Russian people. Russia is gripped by anti-Russian sentiments. Until recently, our people were called Russians. And in fairy tales they said “the Russian spirit smells”, the Russian was strong, he respected himself, he respected the people around him. Loved his land. He cultivated it sparing no effort. Raised children with love. I respected the elderly. The people were wise.
We are the only people who are called as an object. For example: a Chinese person is a Chinese object, a French person is a French object, a German person is a German object, and in Russia a Russian person and a Russian object.
What do emigrants bring to Russia?
The huge migration to Russia has significantly worsened our situation. We are simply being forced out of our territories. Migrants bring with them their history, culture, and customs that are incompatible with our way of life. And religion, since time immemorial, we have been professing Christianity, the most peaceful religion in the world. Why do we need an alien religion? New sects and religions are constantly emerging. They want to destroy our language, culture, customs. The streets of our cities are increasingly filled with people of the black and yellow races. Everywhere the speech is not Russian. Even in the regions of the far north you can meet a woman in a veil. They don’t “work hard” like our Russians in factories, they occupied trade.
Interracial marriage is a completely separate issue.
How are things going in the army?
Not all is well in the Russian army either. Every year there are fewer and fewer people willing to join the army. Let's say in the 60s - 80s of the last century, serving in the army was an honorable thing, every boy dreamed that when he grew up he would definitely go to serve in the army. The army was a school of courage. And now? Teenagers are afraid to join the army; the army is associated with prison. Let's think about how the army differs from a prison now? In prison, the terms are longer and the person serves a sentence for the crime committed. All the differences end there, then everything is the same. A person in the army does not have any rights, he can be beaten, maimed for life, and this insecurity frightens young boys. They shave his head bald and give him uncomfortable clothes and shoes. And what about nutrition, where is the complete diet needed for a growing body? Absent! Well, who will go there voluntarily? I don’t blame the guys who don’t want to join the army; when human conditions are created, there will be crowds of people willing to serve in the army.
What is the situation with the education of our fellow citizens?
The educational system in Russia also leaves much to be desired. In the 70s-90s we were the most reading nation on the planet. Everyone read it, both children and adults. Literary magazines enjoyed enormous success and were published in millions of copies. Where are they now: “Youth”, “New World”, “Foreign Literature” and a host of others? They disappeared as unnecessary, just like bookstores. Previously, every small town had its own bookstore.
What about schools? I get the impression that now the most important thing in school is not education, but passing on everything that money requires. If previously it was believed that school should teach children, now the child must study at home, and if suddenly he does not master the educational material, he can study with a teacher separately for money. Have you noticed how tutoring is booming now? If in the Soviet Union these were isolated cases, now they happen all the time. I remember the times when the teacher would stay after school and tutor struggling students.
What about higher education institutions? Students are given a lot of unnecessary information that is far from their specialty. It is physically impossible to assimilate all this. Why are we asking such a question? Smart guys answer that this is necessary for general development. And the result of all this is deplorable; semi-specialists leave higher educational institutions. Alas, it seems that this state does not need educated and thinking people.
And how many inventions were stolen under the pretext that the Russians couldn’t do anything. Here is not a complete list of developments patented in the West: a car, a bicycle, anesthesia and even computer removable disks were developed in the late 70s of the last century in one of our research institutes.
I think that after all of the above, no one has any doubts about the genocide of the Russian people. That it is beneficial for someone that Russians are illiterate, unthinking people. After all, it is easier to control the unconscious mass.
I turn to the analysis of evidence and materials on the last, fifth point of the charge brought against the President of the Russian Federation B. Yeltsin: committing a serious crime - genocide, responsibility for which is provided for in Article 357 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
In our analysis, we proceeded and proceed from factual data about the situation that developed in the country during Yeltsin’s presidency, his specific actions and inactions. We also proceeded from Russian and international legislation, the rights and duties of the president provided for by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
Our accusation against President Yeltsin is based on the fact that, as we have already noted, in accordance with Article 80 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, he is the head of state, the guarantor of the country’s Constitution, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. According to the Constitution, he determines the main directions of the state’s domestic and foreign policy. The President bears full responsibility for the state of the economy, the Armed Forces, the social sphere, and the standard of living of Russians, since he forms the federal government and directly manages the activities of law enforcement ministries and departments, the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Justice, and Russian intelligence services.
By the Resolution of the Congress of People's Deputies of the RSFSR dated November 1, 1991 “On the Legal Support of Economic Reform,” the President, until December 1, 1992, had the right to suspend laws and adopt decrees that contradict the laws of the Russian Federation. It was during this period that the president adopted decrees that opened the way for privatization, which robbed and ruined the majority of Russians, and other inhumane decisions.
On April 30, 1997, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, by its resolution, confirmed the right of the president to issue decrees to regulate the sphere of public relations where the law must be in force before its adoption. It must be said that the president uses his “decree” power quite widely and freely.
The concept of “genocide” was first introduced into international law and enshrined in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1948.
The Soviet Union acceded to this convention in 1954, and therefore it applies to the Russian Federation as the legal successor of the USSR. Article 2 of this convention defined genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such by: first, killing members of such group; second, causing serious bodily harm or intentional self-harm to members of such a group; the deliberate creation of such living conditions for any group that are designed to lead to its complete or partial physical destruction, the prevention of childbirth among such a group, and the last point: the forcible transfer of children from one human group to another.”
A similar definition of the crime of genocide is contained in Article 357 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which is classified as a serious crime, and an exceptional penalty is established for it - the death penalty.
For the first time in the Russian Federation, criminal liability for genocide was established by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which came into force on January 1, 1997. However, we believe that the responsibility for genocide provided for by international convention has been in effect in Russia since an earlier period. In this regard, it is appropriate to refer to Articles 28 and 63 of the Constitution, which was in force until December 12, 1993.
Article 28 stated that the Russian Federation respects human rights and freedoms, including the rights of national minorities, by “faithfully fulfilling obligations and other generally recognized principles and norms of international law.” These include the International Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Article 63 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation established the right of every citizen “in accordance with international treaties of the Russian Federation to apply to interstate bodies for the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms.”
It is also necessary to recall the content of Article 15 of the Constitution, which came into force after December 12, 1993, which clearly established the primacy of international law over national legislation. Part 4 of the said article states that “the generally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation are an integral part of its legal system. If an international treaty of the Russian Federation establishes rules other than those provided by law, then the rules of the international treaty apply.”
Thus, based on Russian legislation, the President of the Russian Federation, Boris Yeltsin, may be held responsible for genocide for the entire period of his tenure as president of the country.
In support of our position, we presented to the commission the “Convention on the Inapplicability of the Statute of Limitations to War Crimes against Humanity,” adopted by the General Assembly on November 26, 1968, which was ratified by the Soviet Union in 1970, that is, it is binding on the Russian Federation. Article 1 of the convention states: “No statute of limitations shall apply to the following offences, regardless of the time when they were committed.” And in this enumeration there is “the crime of genocide, as defined in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, even if these acts do not constitute a violation of the domestic law of the country in which they were committed.” Thus, the said convention clearly states that punishment for the crime of genocide must follow, even if domestic national legislation does not determine responsibility for it.
Crimes of genocide are committed with direct intent. The guilty person consciously desires the consequences specified in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, as well as in Article 357 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
As a rule, genocide consists of committing a series of organized, purposeful actions that develop into a specific line of behavior. At the same time, this can also be inaction, which also constitutes a specific line of behavior, such as, for example, leaving people without food, not providing them with assistance, disrupting the delivery of food, fuel, and other sources for normal living in the Far North, Kamchatka, Sakhalin, and Primorye , long-term non-payment of wages, pensions and so on.
This is a form of genocide in the form of failure to take measures to save the dying, with the expectation that as a result of such inaction the death of thousands, millions of people will inevitably occur.
The subject of a crime in the form of genocide can be an ordinary individual or official. In our case, Boris Yeltsin, head of state, president of the Russian Federation.
We believe that the genocide carried out by the President of Russia and his entourage is carried out by deliberately creating for the indigenous peoples of Russia, primarily the Russian people, such living conditions that lead to their physical destruction, including by preventing childbirth.
Today we do not consider it necessary to name the names of the accomplices of the genocide, since the subject of the study is the activities of the president. They exist, and responsibility for it will come in the near future. And this responsibility will be borne by former prime ministers and persons who performed these duties, a number of former ministers of the Russian Federation, assistants and advisers to the president.
We associate the causes of genocide with the so-called large-scale reform of society, begun in the early 90s by Yeltsin and his team, with the replacement of one socio-political system with another, which undoubtedly caused the destruction of the previous living conditions of citizens, without any compensation for the losses they suffered losses. The reasons lie in the president’s desire to quickly erase from people’s consciousness the previously formed idea of patriotism and the previous concept of social development. To eradicate through the destruction of certain groups of people - carriers of these beliefs. Therefore, genocide primarily fell on the elderly, pensioners who lived most of their years in the Soviet Union, as well as educators, representatives of science and culture, which we will discuss in detail below.
And now about the essence of the accusation brought against the president.
Since the beginning of the 90s of this century, Russia for the first time has been quite tangibly faced with depopulation and degeneration of the nation. Thus, over the last five-year period, average life expectancy for men has decreased from 67 to 57 years and for women - from 76 to 70 years.
Russia's population is declining uncontrollably. Currently, the number of deaths is almost twice the number of births. The country's birth rate is one of the lowest in Europe and almost 40 percent below that required for simple demographic replacement.
Population losses between 1992 and 1997 amounted to over four million people. Russia's overall demographic losses, taking into account those who died and were not born due to unfavorable social conditions, exceeded 10 million people. For comparison, I note that during the Civil War (1918-1920), the country's population decreased by 2.8 million people. By 2005, Russia's population may decrease by another 9 - 10 million people.
It is with bitterness and alarm that we note that during Yeltsin’s rule, the number of children in Russia decreased by 3.7 million.
The commission's materials contain data indicating that over seven years, not a single child was born in 500 families of Russian refugees from Tajikistan living in unbearable conditions in the suburbs of Moscow.
These are some of the consequences of the president's policies. In our opinion, it is akin to the methods of depopulation of the Slavic peoples developed by the Nazis with the aim of clearing the economic space of the USSR for a race of Aryan supermen.
Now this policy is being pursued in the interests of a new class of owners, which views the country's population as a burden that impedes the exploitation of Russia's natural resources.
A country without external invasion today suffers human, material and moral losses comparable to losses from foreign military intervention.
The Yeltsin government's publication of Resolution No. 567 of May 8, 1996, approving a list of social indications for abortion - artificial termination of pregnancy, can be called a policy of deliberate genocide associated with the prevention of childbirth. These include income per family member below the subsistence level, large families, lack of housing, living in a hostel or in a private apartment, an unmarried woman, a woman or her husband duly recognized as unemployed, and so on.
The Nazis pursued exactly the same policy regarding abortion in the occupied territories. The very term “abortion for social reasons” by the destroyers of the Russian peoples was taken from the documents of the Nazi Himmler.
The number of abortions in Russia is approximately 1.8 times higher than the number of births. Our women, driven to despair by social conditions of life, with no hope for their improvement, refuse to continue the Russian family.
If someone doesn’t like the foreign word “genocide,” then let’s call everything that happened in Russia during Boris Yeltsin’s presidency with a clear Russian definition as “mass killing, destruction of people with the help of a financial, economic, social noose thrown around the neck of the Russian peoples.” .
Does the President know about these terrible processes of human extinction? Yes, he knows, but he deliberately does not take any action to save them. In Yeltsin's reforms, a person is only an object of influence. His life was deliberately sacrificed to so-called market relations, the redistribution of property.
There is no need to talk at length about the president’s awareness and deliberate actions. Everything is quite obvious, and the Commission on Women, Family and Demography under the President of the Russian Federation was forced to acknowledge the Russian demographic tragedy in letters to the Federal Assembly in December 1998 and January 1999.
The president's press secretaries constantly state that the president knows and controls the situation in Russia. We have been hearing this for many years. We presented the commission with the materials of the All-Russian Pirogov Congress of Doctors, held in November 1995. Even then, doctors sent a letter to the president and expressed concern about the crisis in the health of the population and medicine in the country.
They noted that everywhere there is an unprecedented decrease in the number of Russian citizens in peacetime. Due to underfunding, healthcare is dying - 80 percent of doctors are sick and themselves need treatment. And further, the doctors noted: the promises set out by the president, who is the guarantor of the Constitution, in the decree on medical issues remained unfulfilled. Addressing the president, the congress stated that doctors cannot understand and accept the indifferent attitude of the authorities to health problems, to the health and life of the citizens of great Russia.
It would seem that after this the president and the government should have taken emergency measures, but the opposite happened. We presented to the commission the resolution of the Second Pirogov Congress of Doctors, held on July 7, 1997, and its other materials. The resolution noted that back in November 1995, “the congress warned of a real threat to the life and health of citizens and appealed to the President and Government of the Russian Federation with an urgent request to take urgent measures to bring the healthcare system out of a critical state, but an adequate response from the President and Government did not follow." In fact, it did not exist at all, as stated by the delegates to the congress of doctors. As a result, the situation has become even more complicated and remains not just tense - it is becoming uncontrollable and today really threatens the security of the country.
This is the conclusion of the congress. It is consistent with the provisions of the state report of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. The doctors’ judgment is absolutely accurate: there was no reaction from the president then, and there hasn’t been one since 1997. The only thing doctors don’t realize is that the ideology of Yeltsin’s reforms is not aimed at preserving the peoples of Russia, but, on the contrary, at their destruction, primarily the older generation, although children are also dying.
The ideologists of Yeltsin’s reforms and the president’s ideological mentors spoke quite eloquently and openly about this. Thus, the “father of Russian democracy” Gavriil Popov advised that the restoration of capitalism is best started by raising prices, reducing incomes, devaluing the population’s savings and then dividing property. The population, as the “architect of perestroika” Alexander Yakovlev said, must completely lose their savings and usual guarantees, then they will learn to live and work as they are ordered. This is the ideology.
Their ideas were fully supported and implemented by Yegor Gaidar. He said that let property be distributed first according to strength, then it will be distributed according to intelligence. The same Gaidar argued that there was nothing wrong with the fact that some pensioners would die out, but society would become more mobile. Khakamada, who was previously a member of the Russian government, spoke in the same spirit: yes, reforms are difficult, and this will continue until the entire old generation dies out. Cynical, but frank.
And now about the mechanism and stages of implementation of the policy of genocide of Russian peoples, and first of all the Russians. The genocide was predetermined by the Belovezhskaya Accords, in the signing and implementation of which the Russian President took an active part. It was the Belovezhskaya Accords that tore apart a single living, political, economic, cultural and linguistic space, violated centuries-old traditions, way of life and reproduction of the population of a single social community and each nation (ethnic group) separately, and generally worsened the living environment of people.
The organizers of the Belovezhskaya Accords, and above all the President of Russia, were aware that industrial and agricultural production of the former Russian Empire, and then the Soviet Union, was formed and developed as a single organism. And they knew that any attempt to break it could be fatal both for the country as a whole and for any part of it that found itself in a separate, “sovereign” space.
Unfortunately, the worst fears began to come true. In Russia, the consequences of the severance of economic ties were aggravated by a sharp change in forms of ownership, the state’s refusal to rationally manage the economy, the sphere of production, and a thoughtless transition to a market economy through the policy of “shock therapy.”
Over the past seven years, in the interests of changing the political and economic system, the President has deliberately pursued a course that has acquired a destructive, destructive character for the country.
According to many economic indicators, Russia has been set back decades. During the reforms, the total volume of industrial production in the country decreased by more than half. In certain sectors of the economy there was a landslide, catastrophic drop in gross domestic product. In particular, the output of mechanical engineering products decreased by 60 percent or more. The decline in production in the light and textile industries amounted to over 80 percent. At many enterprises in other industries, production volumes decreased fivefold. Some enterprises, including city-forming ones, practically ceased production, and their workers, engineers and technical staff were left without a means of subsistence.
Agriculture was fundamentally undermined. Gross output in farms of all categories decreased by more than 35 - 40 percent. The grain harvest fell by half. Meat production also decreased by half, milk production by more than 30 percent. The number of cattle, sheep and poultry has decreased by two or more times. It will take many years to reproduce them to the 1990 level, just as it will take many years to restore the Russian arable field, which has been reduced by more than 20 million hectares.
Even in the recent past, dear deputies, Russia was one of the leaders of world scientific and technological progress, possessing the most powerful intellectual potential. Today it is rapidly acquiring the status of a colonial-type state. Over 80 percent of the development of new equipment and the latest technologies remain unclaimed. Hundreds of thousands of scientific and technical workers are leaving science. By losing scientific potential, the country also loses its future, the opportunity to create decent living conditions for its citizens.
Funding for science in Russia is declining every year and today amounts to less than one percent of GDP, and even these meager amounts do not reach it. In this regard, in our opinion, both the decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On the Doctrine for the Development of Russian Science” dated June 13, 1996, and the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated May 7, 1997 seem cynical and unsecured.
In December 1996, the entire world community was shocked by the news of the suicide of the director of the Federal Nuclear Center "Chelyabinsk-70" Vladimir Nechai, and in December 1997, a shot that shook the entire country was heard in the home office of Yuri Mamatov, a 49-year-old professor, director of the Institute for Computational Problems. technician, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Why are talented Russian scientists who served and wanted to serve the country voluntarily leaving this life today? The answer to this question can be both complex and simple: from hopelessness, loss of faith in the future of the Russian state, from the fact that science in Russia today is left to its own devices.
The destruction of the economy and science has generated a multi-million army of unemployed people, deprived of basic guarantees of physical survival. Their number, according to official statistics, ranges from 6 to 7 million people, or 10 percent of the economically active population. But in fact, unemployment exceeds 25 million people, of which only a small part has the opportunity to receive unemployment benefits, and even then irregularly.
In the interests of a narrow social stratum, the president and government carried out the privatization of public state property in Russia. As a result, the relatively prosperous 20 percent of the population today accounts for more than half of the total income, and the bulk of it is appropriated by a clan of 200 - 300 families that have usurped a large share of the national wealth and state power in the country.
Privatization, carried out according to Boris Yeltsin’s scenario, upset production, became a convenient means for theft, led to the impoverishment of the peoples of Russia and at the same time caused a powerful wave of criminalization of Russian society, in particular widespread corruption. The President bears direct responsibility for this. Massive theft and impoverishment of people would not have occurred if legal guarantees against deception and theft had been created during privatization. The President not only did not take a single step in this direction, on the contrary, he destroyed the last thing that still somehow protected citizens from arbitrariness.
In the summer of 1991, the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation adopted the law “On registered privatization accounts and deposits in the RSFSR.” According to this law, Russian citizens were to be allocated only personalized privatization account books, which would protect their legal rights. However, the president, contrary to the law, on August 14, 1992, issued decree No. 914 “On the implementation of the system of privatization checks in the Russian Federation,” approving the provision on privatization checks, which completely eliminated registered check accounts. Thus, Yeltsin opened a wide road for robbing the people and deceiving them. Everyone knows what consequences this led to.
Many people warned and informed about the criminal, predatory nature of B. Yeltsin’s privatization, including during the analysis of its first stage. In particular, the head of the Center for System Research of the RGSI, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor Larionov, emphasized back in March 1994 that there was a need for “a fundamental change in the concept of privatization and the process of its implementation; the continued presence at the head of the State Property Committee of Chubais, one of the main implementers of shock-therapy reforms, is unacceptable, brought the country to the edge of the abyss."
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor Kolosov, in his conclusion on the progress of privatization (also in 1994), noted that privatization in its modern form is not aimed at increasing production efficiency. In general, measures in the field of privatization and methods of its implementation mainly contributed to the plundering of state property. To assess the real damage caused to the state and population, in his opinion, a special investigation would be required. The same assessments were made in March 1994 by the Institute of International Economic and Political Research, the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the World Russian Council, the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation and many others.
Despite this, the president refused to change the nature and direction of privatization. The liberalization of prices, begun with the consent of Boris Yeltsin by the Gaidar government at the beginning of 1992, led to a complete depreciation of the income and savings of citizens. It was also carried out to please a narrow clan, which acquired and expanded its wealth at the expense of the robbed absolute majority of the population. At once, Russians lost savings of almost 250 trillion rubles (this is in old terms), which constituted an important source of subsistence.
In 1997, 34 million people had incomes below the subsistence level. According to this indicator, poverty in Russia has increased 14-16 times compared to 1990, on the eve of reforms. Taking into account the rising prices for food, utilities, communications, and transport, at least 70 - 80 million Russians are at or below the poverty line, and in fact on the brink of survival.
But back in 1995, in his address to the Federal Assembly, Yeltsin spoke of the fact that a fifth of the country’s population was below the poverty line as a national disgrace. It's 1995. At the same time, and even earlier, he called the appearance of “new poor” people who had been receiving humiliatingly low wages for a long time another national disgrace. And at the same time, after uttering phrases about shame, Yeltsin repeatedly rejected laws on increasing wages, old-age pensions and disability. As a result, in 1998, almost 40 percent of the Russian population began to live below the poverty line.
We have comprehensively analyzed all the president's messages to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. They are of some interest to us in the sense that the president knew about the processes that were disastrous for the people. It is also noteworthy that the fulfillment of the annual messages occurred almost exactly the opposite. This is not surprising: the president constantly declares publicly one thing, but practically does the opposite.
In general, I would like to note that the president’s messages are essentially a manifestation of unheard-of cynicism and lies; they can be called examples of hypocrisy and mockery of people. Each so-called Yeltsin message about reforming Russian society, exposing deadly points on the body of a sick organism, with its distorted execution, became just the next stage in the program of genocide, the extermination of the peoples of Russia.
The liberalization of prices and the depreciation of citizens' incomes and savings have been carried out and are being carried out by the president quite consciously and purposefully. As evidence of this, I will refer to some facts.
Back in October 1991, Boris Yeltsin stated that price liberalization would inevitably be accompanied by the introduction of measures to prevent wage growth, limit the payment of pensions and social insurance benefits, reduce unemployment benefits, and also the abolition of price restrictions on consumer goods and services.
These measures, in the context of the population losing their savings, long-term non-payment of wages and pensions, inevitably had to lead and did lead to the death of millions of Russian citizens.
49 -The President was aware of the harmfulness of his guidelines, which formed the basis of the “Memorandum on the Economic Policy of the Russian Federation,” published in 1992, and which he consistently implemented.
In 1995, the law “On the restoration and protection of savings of citizens of the Russian Federation” was adopted and came into force, which obligated the president and the government to take comprehensive measures to restore the purchasing power of citizens’ deposits and compensate them for losses. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation also enshrined this same obligation of state power in its decision on May 31, 1993. However, neither the president nor the government has yet taken any serious measures to implement legislative acts.
The President and the executive branch are directly responsible for the robbery of the population through financial pyramids, because they, without creating a reliable legal basis, allowed the activities of clearly criminal and semi-criminal organizations that took away more than 20 trillion rubles of savings from Russians at that time.
Did the President know about this massive robbery? Yes, I knew.
We return once again to the President's messages to the Federal Assembly. In the first of them, Yeltsin stated that many people who entrusted their deposits to unscrupulous companies and banks lost their money. The problem, in his opinion, required a speedy resolution.
But instead of permission, the “Black Tuesday” of October 1994 hit the Russians, when the ruble depreciated on the currency exchanges or, as they say, “failed” by 800 points at once. On August 17, 1998, the so-called “Black Monday” broke out, which led to a panicked flight of foreign capital from Russia, the destruction of the entire banking system, and another massive loss of bank deposits by Russians.
However, the destruction of the population’s habitat and deprivation of their basic means of subsistence does not end there. Despite the sharp and justified protests of prominent scientists and economists about the chosen course of economic reforms that was disastrous for Russia and its people, the president refused to significantly adjust it. In the summer of 1996, a group of Nobel Prize laureates, both foreign and domestic, addressed him with a similar letter, revealing the detrimental nature of such economic reforms for Russia.
Extensively using the levers of destructive macroeconomic policies, the president and Gaidar’s government, under the pretext of fighting inflation, deliberately began to reduce the circulating money supply in the production sector. This immediately caused a payment crisis, blocking of production, criminalization of the economy, a sharp reduction in wages, as well as a rapid increase in external and internal public debt, which the government again tried to pay off through citizens’ savings and non-payment of wages. The machine for issuing bonds and other surrogates for securities was launched at full speed to impose them on Russians instead of real money. Another powerful blow to the well-being of the country's population was dealt by a systematic reduction in social spending, primarily on education, medicine, pensions, and various benefits.
We believe that the president knows for certain that for the majority of the population, salary is the main and most often the only source of existence. Despite this, in the interests of enriching a small clan, which became the social support of political power, he deliberately agreed to long-term non-payment of money and benefits, in fact, to starve hundreds of thousands, millions of fellow citizens. At the beginning of September 1997, wage arrears in the production sector reached 53-55 trillion rubles, in the public sector - 12-13 trillion, and for child benefits exceeded 14 trillion rubles. Many categories of workers have not received wages for several months, and for some it lasts for years. People faint from malnutrition and hunger, and many commit suicide. More than 60 thousand suicides occur in Russia every year; this is almost twice as much as in the Soviet Union.
The solvency of the vast majority of Russians has sharply decreased. For comparison, per capita consumption of basic food products in 1990 and 1997, respectively, was (in kilograms): meat and meat products - 70 and 48; milk and dairy products - 378 and 135; fish and fish products - 15 and 9.6. According to experts, today the deficiency of protein in the diet of Russians is 35-40 percent, vitamin deficiency - 50-60 percent. With a normal average daily diet of approximately 3,000 calories, for many people this figure is uncontrollably approaching a critical point. If in such a situation the mortality rate from hunger is at least one case per thousand population (and we are already seeing this), then approximately 150 thousand people die from malnutrition per year.
In December 1997, the Federal Assembly, trying to prevent a food crisis and the onset of famine, as well as the country's increasing dependence on imports of basic food products, adopted the law “On Food Security of the Russian Federation.” Article 4 stated that Russia’s food independence is considered unsecured if the annual production of vital food products is less than 80 percent of the need.
The President returned the law to the Federal Assembly without consideration only because it provided for the government-guaranteed provision of physical and economic accessibility for citizens of the country of vital products, in accordance with physiological nutritional standards. According to the president, this required additional expenditures from the federal budget.
However, the government did not give its opinion on the draft law.
Isn't this genocide?
The President refused to save the Russians from hunger and death only because this would require additional expenses from the budget! A more convincing example of the policy of genocide against the peoples of the country can hardly be given.
Having returned the law on far-fetched grounds, the president did not offer anything in return. It only remains for us to add that food products have now become inaccessible to many Russians.
It must be taken into account that the country is again being overwhelmed by tuberculosis, cholera, venereal and other diseases. The AIDS epidemic is spreading at a dangerous pace; the number of victims in 1996-1997 alone increased more than sevenfold and continues to grow. The country's population has turned out to be subject to mass alcoholism and drug addiction, spiritual corruption, and this is uncontrollably destroying the human potential of Russia, especially the younger generation. Due to poverty and the low level of material support of their parents, more than half of schoolchildren have poor health. Almost half of the young conscripts are unfit for military service due to physical and mental illness. At the same time, the number of homeless children who are absolutely not involved in the general educational process is growing catastrophically. Here the situation at the end of the 20th century becomes worse than after the Civil War or in the post-war years.
In his messages to the Federal Assembly in 1995 and 1996, the president stated the inadmissibility of dividing education for the rich and everyone else, the need to eliminate the shameful problem of child neglect for the country, and also to create a system of state guarantees and free medical care.
Unfortunately, these words remained an empty phrase, and child neglect has increased several times, and now the number of such children has exceeded 3.5 million. Medical care is becoming paid and inaccessible to the average Russian, just like food.
On September 8, 1998, the State Duma, based on the current situation, was forced to turn to the president with a request to take emergency measures to save Russian children from hunger. In many areas, they are fed mixed feed for food. According to preliminary data, several million children were on the brink of survival. After all, there is nothing to feed them anymore; there is not even enough bread and milk.
And all this is happening against the backdrop of the fabulous enrichment of a small group of people, Yeltsin’s friends and his family, huge financial costs for the maintenance of the president himself, his many residences, recreation areas, and so on.
As a result of the genocide, the population of the North and Far Eastern outskirts of the country sharply decreased. The economy and social sphere of these regions are in complete decline, and the indigenous people, including the small peoples of the North, are doomed to widespread extinction.
Despite all the obviousness of the manifestation of genocide in Russia, it can still be argued that the costs that our society bears are an inevitable consequence of the radical renewal and development of the country, and not the result of someone’s malicious actions. In addition, the president’s policies, in their opinion, were approved by the Russians when he was re-elected to the highest government post.
We cannot agree with such justification.
Firstly, there is no doubt that a great deception of the people regarding Boris Yeltsin’s true policy has occurred and continues.
Secondly, the repeat elections were held in gross violation of the electoral legislation by the president, and the voting results were falsified. We talked about this in quite a lot of detail and at length. In addition, I will refer to only two circumstances.
Even at the All-Russian referendum on April 25, 1993, more than half of those who voted - and this is over 34 million citizens - spoke in favor of the early termination of Boris Yeltsin's powers. And after his so-called re-election in July 1996, throughout the country millions of people participated and are participating in strikes, rallies, and other protests against the president and his policies.
Let us recall that the legislative bodies of 48 constituent entities of the Russian Federation decided to support the initiated procedure for removing the president from his position.
There is no doubt that Boris Yeltsin did not make a new reformer-tsar, like Peter the Great, because the first, even through the blood and torment of the people, built Russia, while the second, through theft and death, destroyed it.
The economic course imposed by Boris Yeltsin on the people has nothing to do with the process of creation, with a fair social policy. On the contrary, it is disastrous and will lead the country to final collapse if this course is not changed.
The essence of the president's policy should be judged not by his declarative statements, but by specific actions and their results. Today, these results are such that it is no longer possible to give any other assessment other than genocide. In this regard, I consider it necessary to recall that the Nuremberg Tribunal tried Nazi criminals not for political ideology, but for the gravest crimes they committed through their misanthropic policies.
But even if we have the most humane goal, if we hypothetically imagine that the president and his team have it, which we deeply doubt, the political course has no right to exist when the very process of achieving this goal is accompanied by enormous human and material losses, nothing inexplicable and unjustified.
The President deliberately destroyed the existing domestic food industry and thereby made the country strategically dependent on foreign supplies. Let us recall that today in Russia the share of imported products is more than 50 percent, and in cities such as Moscow, St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg - from 80 to 90 percent.
By eliminating the state monopoly on the production and sale of alcoholic products, the president and the government deliberately plunged the country into complete alcoholism, which is causing the population to dangerously degrade and die out, especially in rural areas. In addition, when the people are deprived of money, free education and medical care are being deliberately abolished, and preschool institutions are being closed.
The President and the government are guilty of the massive outflow of domestic capital abroad, amounting to 350 - 400 billion US dollars, and of preventing their return. And this is the money of Russians, most of whom are now forced to eke out a miserable existence.
Citing the lack of financial resources in the budget, the president twice after 1996 rejected the law “On Amendments to Article 10 of the Law “On Veterans,” which provided for additional sources of funding. The financial situation of these poor Russians could have been significantly improved long ago if the president had signed the law. The State Duma and the Federation Council were forced to override his veto, and only then, on November 18, 1998, the president signed this law.
In the same way, the president persistently rejected the law “On streamlining the remuneration of employees of public sector organizations.” The State Duma and the Federation Council overcame the president’s veto, since the already meager wages of workers in this sector have not been indexed for about four years and will not allow people to survive in difficult times. The President's veto was overridden by the State Duma and the Federation Council only in January of this year.
On far-fetched grounds, the president rejected the law “On urgent measures for state support of primary vocational education,” adopted by the Federal Assembly in December 1998.
The President has twice, since December 1994, rejected the law “On the restoration and protection of savings of citizens of the Russian Federation.” He was forced to sign it only after the State Duma and the Federation Council overcame the presidential veto. Three times the president also rejected the law “On the basic cost of the necessary social package” adopted in July 1996 by the Federal Assembly.
The President rejected such important laws aimed at supporting the lives of Russians as on the procedure for transferring government securities of the USSR or certificates of the USSR Savings Bank into target debt obligations of the Russian Federation, on certificates of the USSR Savings Bank, the placement of which was carried out through the Savings Bank of the Russian Federation. Thus, Russians were deprived of compensation for the savings they had at the beginning of the so-called Gaidar reforms - “shock therapy”.
Our analysis of legal documents and the president’s actions allows us to draw an unambiguous conclusion: Yeltsin deliberately did not allow even a minimal improvement in the material condition of the dying peoples of Russia. At his suggestion or by himself, wages were increased only for employees of the courts, the prosecutor's office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the special services, that is, those structures that, with difficulty, but still support the ruling regime that is disastrous for the country. At the same time, we draw your attention to the fact that, given the persistent reluctance of the President to improve the financial situation of Russians, he, in violation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, issued Decree No. 854 on July 18, 1998, which increased taxes from individuals and legal entities for the use of earth. This is another financial noose around the necks of Russians.
Boris Yeltsin's reference to the lack of money in the budget is untenable. To confirm this, we will refer to the materials of audits by the Accounts Chamber of budget execution for 1996, 1997 and 1998. Not a single budget law adopted was implemented by the governments formed and led by President Yeltsin. Moreover, massive abuses were committed in the execution of budgets, and government members engaged in deception. Despite this, Yeltsin did not react properly and never once raised the question of the responsibility of high-ranking officials.
Only. an audit by the Accounts Chamber of budget execution for 1997 revealed damage of 65.8 trillion rubles (in old terms) caused to the state and society. Thus, the president’s inaction actually encouraged embezzlers to steal public money allocated for socio-economic purposes.
B. Yeltsin did not ensure compliance, and in a number of cases, even more recently, refused to comply with international legal acts aimed at preventing famine and extinction of people. This is the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the USSR acceded to it on January 3, 1976); Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace, adopted on November 12, 1984; Declaration on the Right to Development of 4 December 1986; The Universal Declaration on the Elimination of Hunger and Malnutrition, approved by a resolution of the UN General Assembly on December 17, 1974; Declaration on the use of scientific and technological progress in the interests of peace and for the benefit of humanity of January 10, 1975.
Yeltsin deliberately fails to implement the requirements of Article 8 of the Declaration of the Right to Development, which states that states must take all necessary measures at the national level to realize equality of opportunity for all with regard to access to basic resources, education, health care, food, housing , employment and fair income distribution.
We believe that the president is the main culprit of mass corruption, bribery, which is corrupting the state apparatus and ruining Russians.
The President, not wanting to actively fight the criminal world, bribery and the shadow economy, rejected the law “On the fight against organized crime”, and three times, under various far-fetched pretexts, rejected the law “On the fight against corruption.”
And a few more examples from modern life. The President and the government did not provide timely financing for the delivery of fuel to Kamchatka and thereby doomed the population of the peninsula to hunger and cold. At the same time, not only paralyzing the production sector, but also destroying normal medical care and education of the younger generation. Today the population of Kamchatka, especially small nations, is on the brink of survival. This is one of the signs of genocide, when people are left without food, fuel and light.
Out of despair, in order to save themselves from starvation, residents of the South Kuril Islands are forced to declare their desire to annex the territory where they live to neighboring Japan, absolutely no longer believing that the federal government in the person of the president can somehow help and save them .
Dear deputies! Genocide has been declared one of the gravest crimes against humanity. Its impact fell with destructive force on Russian citizens. The country is in ruins, writhing in death convulsions, and this in itself already makes it impossible for Boris Yeltsin to continue to hold his position. We believe that his removal will be the beginning of the process of revival of the country. This is within our power, dear people’s representatives. Our positive decision on the issue of accusation will be a serious warning to both the current and future rulers of Russia.
